- Original Message -
> From: "Jim Long"
> To: bobr...@centrum.is
> Cc: "Noeck" , lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 2:51:41 AM
> Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 07:45:51PM +, bobr...@
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 07:45:51PM +, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Noeck"
> >
> > A naive question: Could the \cadenzaOff command be changed in a way that
> > it automatically implies the end of a measure at that point.
>
> I can think of instances w
- Original Message -
> From: "Noeck"
> To: bobr...@centrum.is
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 7:53:58 PM
> Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
>
> Hi David,
>
> > I recall thinking at some point that perhaps L
Hi David,
> I recall thinking at some point that perhaps LilyPond would count up the
> stuff not between \cadenzaOn ... \cadenzaOff and place barlines in the
> correct place (it doesn't).
What do you mean here differing from 1) (which is what I also proposed
in a previous mail)? I don't underst
- Original Message -
> From: "Noeck"
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 3:55:07 PM
> Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
>
> A naive question: Could the \cadenzaOff command be changed in a way that
> it automatically impli
A naive question: Could the \cadenzaOff command be changed in a way that
it automatically implies the end of a measure at that point. Perhaps I
overlook cases where this is not wanted, but where I use this command, I
want a bar line and a new bar starting with beat one right after it.
Any comments
Hi David,
how about this:
\version "2.18.2"
\score {
\relative c' {
\clef F
\key a \major
r4-\fermata cis4 ~
cis8.-[ \grace { dis32 cis bis cis } dis!16-] \cadenzaOn e4 ~
\teeny
\stemUp
e32-[ dis e dis-] \cadenzaOff cis-[ bis! c b-] a-[ gis a gis-]
%% 4/4 measur
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Knoop"
> To: "Lilypond User List"
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 12:14:36 PM
> Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
>
> At 10:49 on 28 Mar 2015, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
> >- Original Message
At 10:49 on 28 Mar 2015, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
>- Original Message -
>> From: "Andrew Bernard"
>Yes, I have accidentals in the cadenza section. As I stated, however,
>in the final measure the cadenza has been ended and a bar line has
>been crossed so the key signature is in full force
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Bernard"
> To: bobr...@centrum.is, "Lillypond Users Mailing List"
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:23:40 AM
> Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
>
> Well, you have a C natural in the group of 32
Well, you have a C natural in the group of 32s, and then in the last bar a C#,
so generally engravers will put a sharp to revert the previous natural and let
the performer know we are back to normal (cadenza or not). That’s how I learned
music (I think!).
Also, when putting manual beaming, you
I provided a bad example in my previous attempt in an effort to be minimal.
Here goes with one that actually illustrates the issue:
I ran into some seemingly odd output when using \cadenzaOn and \cadenzaOff.
According to this:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/displayi
12 matches
Mail list logo
