On 9/5/2012 9:50 AM, Tiresia GIUNO wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:43:49 +0200
> Federico Bruni wrote:
>
>> Then it may depend on the context: you may need to use Staff instead
>> of Timing. I've not looked at your example...
> Nope.. If you find an answer, please let me know. This issue interests
2012/9/5 Tiresia GIUNO :
> I notice that putting three 16th rests keeps extended also the 16th
> beam:
> \relative { d16[ r r r e16] r r8 }
>
> So it must be the 8th rest that stop the 16th beam.
Ok, example found.
All I can say is that it's not because of a collision.
\relative c' {
\o
e
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/beam-across-larger-rest-tp132192p132290.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:43:49 +0200
Federico Bruni wrote:
> Then it may depend on the context: you may need to use Staff instead
> of Timing. I've not looked at your example...
Nope.. If you find an answer, please let me know. This issue interests
me a lot.
___
2012/9/5 Tiresia GIUNO :
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:23:39 +0200
> Federico Bruni wrote:
>> 2012/9/5 Tiresia GIUNO :
>> > So it must be the 8th rest that stop the 16th beam. I would expect
>> > that setting the baseMoment to 1/16 would bring to the wished
>> > result:
>> >
>> > \set Timing.bas
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:23:39 +0200
Federico Bruni wrote:
> 2012/9/5 Tiresia GIUNO :
> > So it must be the 8th rest that stop the 16th beam. I would expect
> > that setting the baseMoment to 1/16 would bring to the wished
> > result:
> >
> > \set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 16)
>
2012/9/5 Tiresia GIUNO :
> So it must be the 8th rest that stop the 16th beam. I would expect that
> setting the baseMoment to 1/16 would bring to the wished result:
>
> \set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 16)
>
> But it doesn't work. So I guess I'm ignoring a default rule which set
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:30:16 +1000
Nick Payne wrote:
> On 04/09/12 17:54, David Bobroff wrote:
> > In this example I have a beam going across a rest larger than the
> > beam value.
> >
> > \version "2.16.0"
> >
> > \relative {
> >{ d16-[ r r8 e16-] r r8 }
> > }
> >
> > The 16th beam breaks ov
On 9/5/2012 2:30 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 04/09/12 17:54, David Bobroff wrote:
>> In this example I have a beam going across a rest larger than the beam
>> value.
>>
>> \version "2.16.0"
>>
>> \relative {
>>{ d16-[ r r8 e16-] r r8 }
>> }
>>
>> The 16th beam breaks over the 8th rest. Is it po
On 04/09/12 17:54, David Bobroff wrote:
In this example I have a beam going across a rest larger than the beam
value.
\version "2.16.0"
\relative {
{ d16-[ r r8 e16-] r r8 }
}
The 16th beam breaks over the 8th rest. Is it possible to extend the
16th beam across the 8th rest like this?:
ht
Hi David,
> 2012/9/4 David Bobroff :
>> In this example I have a beam going across a rest larger than the beam
>> value.
>>
>> \version "2.16.0"
>>
>> \relative {
>> { d16-[ r r8 e16-] r r8 }
>> }
>>
>> The 16th beam breaks over the 8th rest. Is it possible to extend the
>> 16th beam across the
2012/9/4 David Bobroff :
> In this example I have a beam going across a rest larger than the beam
> value.
>
> \version "2.16.0"
>
> \relative {
> { d16-[ r r8 e16-] r r8 }
> }
>
> The 16th beam breaks over the 8th rest. Is it possible to extend the
> 16th beam across the 8th rest like this?:
>
In this example I have a beam going across a rest larger than the beam
value.
\version "2.16.0"
\relative {
{ d16-[ r r8 e16-] r r8 }
}
The 16th beam breaks over the 8th rest. Is it possible to extend the
16th beam across the 8th rest like this?:
http://notendur.centrum.is/~bobroff/double-be
13 matches
Mail list logo
