Jean -
Merci! This is exactly what I needed.
-kwb
On Jul 24, 2022, 11:50 PM -0700, Jean Abou Samra , wrote:
>
>
> > Le 25 juil. 2022 à 08:23, Kyle Baldwin a écrit :
> >
> > I'm trying to create a custom bar number engraver that will respond to
> > couple of different events, but wanted to initi
> Le 25 juil. 2022 à 08:23, Kyle Baldwin a écrit :
>
>
> I'm trying to create a custom bar number engraver that will respond to couple
> of different events, but wanted to initially try and clone the Bar number
> engraver in c to scheme. Everything seems to work the way I want it to,
> exc
I'm trying to create a custom bar number engraver that will respond to couple
of different events, but wanted to initially try and clone the Bar number
engraver in c to scheme. Everything seems to work the way I want it to, except
for the positioning seems to be wrong. The numbers appear in line
Op donderdag 8 januari 2009, schreef Nick Payne:
> I have a fermata over a double barline, notated with
>
> \bar "||" \mark\markup\small {\musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata"}
>
> This works fine except where the barline falls at the end of a line on the
> score, in which case the fermata is placed over
rnock; lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Fermata over barline problem
>
> 2009/1/8 Nick Payne :
> > I have a fermata over a double barline, notated with
> >
> > \bar "||" \mark\markup\small {\musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata"}
> >
> > This wo
2009/1/8 Nick Payne :
> I have a fermata over a double barline, notated with
>
> \bar "||" \mark\markup\small {\musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata"}
>
> This works fine except where the barline falls at the end of a line on the
> score, in which case the fermata is placed over the clef sign at the start
I have a fermata over a double barline, notated with
\bar "||" \mark\markup\small {\musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata"}
This works fine except where the barline falls at the end of a line on the
score, in which case the fermata is placed over the clef sign at the start
of the next line. Is this a bu
This seems to be a bug that only happens when you use \bar "||:" and
the bar is not at a line break. A workaround is to only use \bar "||:"
when it's absolutely necessary, i.e. at line breaks (where the bug
doesn't show up). You can use forced
line breaks (using the \break command) to ensure that
Hello all,
I have a problem with a repeat barline in a StaffGroup and a PianoStaff.
It looks more or less like this:
|:
|:
|:
So there is this double dot also between the staves.
It only happens two times in my score but I have no idea why.
In the attachment I extracted the horns from
PDFs would have it
> switched on as well.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Quality-%28was-RE%3A-barline-problem%29-t1805063.html#a4919713
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond
Kress, Stephen schreef:
Edit your PDF file and search for the string "/Type/ExtGState". It
should be preceeded by a double angle bracket, << (probably on the same
line). It probably has a single line like, "/OPM 1" followed by a
closing double angle bracket, >> and the word "endobj". (The do
Title: PDF Quality (was RE: barline problem)
I've recently been doing a lot of work with creating PDF files (I'm working on a Java library to create PDFs using Java's standard Graphics object style). If you have the ability, I have a simple experiment for you to try to see
the png output I am
getting has a bit of a "fuzzy" look to it, compared to the examples in the
lilypond docs. By fuzzy, I mean it has that sort of anti-aliasing look...
Any ideas how I can reduce that for cleaner png files?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-probl
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Hofmeister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: barline problem
On 6/14/06 10:22 AM, "Dewdman42" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are of course welcome to your opinion, b
difference whatsoever. It still looked like
cr uh like not as good as I hoped...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4874808
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com
Hello users,
Ghostscript comes with tools for ps/pdf conversion into several formats.
Xpdf converts pdf->ps->pdf. They all run in Windows.
Another thing to try is to convert the PDF into PDF again, using print to
PDF tools. There are many like that for free, like PDF995.
I may be wrong but Te
as ever.
>
> pdfopt does not improve any hinting in the originally-generated PDF.
>
> I don't think these are viable solutions.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4872618
Sent fr
Hi, Daniel:
I don't think these are viable solutions.
Thanks for doing the tests, and reporting back!
It will be interesting to see how this thread is "resolved" (i.e.,
what the final solution turns out to be).
Best regards,
Kieren.
___
lilypo
Dewdman42 wrote:
Oh that is very interesting. I have not heard of these utilities ps2ps or
pdf2pdf. I'll google them and try it. Thanks.
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Have you passed a Lilypond-outputted PDF (or the PS) through ps2ps
(or pdf2pdf, etc.)?
ps2ps + ps2pdf results in a file t
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4869457
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi, Dewdman!
I need better PDF output.
Have you passed a Lilypond-outputted PDF (or the PS) through ps2ps
(or pdf2pdf, etc.)?
I haven't used that for this particular purpose, but I have found
that certain versions of Adobe Illustrator will read a "post-ps2ps"
file better than a "pre-ps
tion to the beautiful printed pages..consider this my official plea to
> the developers to try to do that.
>
> regards
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4868193
> Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
e the binaries are in
> the
> installed package, I get a warning: command not found. :( Not sure how
> to
> fix this.
>
> Walter
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4869264
Sent fr
Walter Hofmeister
>>
>>
>
> Yea interesting. So I take it there is no way to make the new lilypond use
> the old mode or something?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4868280
> Sent from the Gnu - Lilypon
- Original Message -
From: "Dewdman42" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: barline problem
that's an interesting point and perhaps in the future that will become
more
standard, but I would reckon not until th
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Hofmeister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: barline problem
On 6/14/06 9:42 AM, "Erik Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 17:25, Stephe
viewer you use, and they can
> probably be displayed a lot faster than pdf or ps can.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4868374
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
_
he old mode or something?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4868280
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Yes Walter, you are correct, Postscript is not based on a particular
resolution. Must print beautifully on that printer of yours.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4868246
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4868193
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 6/14/06 9:42 AM, "Erik Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 June 2006 17:25, Stephen wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Dewdman42" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:55 PM
&
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 17:25, Stephen wrote:
> Your right, Lilypond does not produce PDF files, ghostscript does. So the
> only thing Lilypond could do is add additional hinting in the PostScript
> file as Hans has already suggested. And as you've already pointed out, what
> matters is how the m
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 17:25, Stephen wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dewdman42" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:55 PM
> Subject: Re: barline problem
>
> > Which gets us to the crux of the problem. Finale and li
- Original Message -
From: "Dewdman42" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: barline problem
Which gets us to the crux of the problem. Finale and lilypond use all of
the
nuances of postscript that they possibly can..perhaps eve
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4855143
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:15:35AM -0700, Dewdman42 scripsit:
> Printing looks fine. I tried installing 3 different third party pdf
> viewers, none of which looked any good at all..they all had drastic
> line connection and line width issues. Perhaps someone can explain
> this to me or tall me a
On 6/13/06 11:35 AM, "Dewdman42" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ok, ran an experiment. for whatever its worth... Overture produced very
> clean and decent looking PDF files. No aliasing or weird artifacts.
> Finale2006 produced crapola...even worse than lilypond. I wonder what the
> differenc
with Finale and lilypond suffer in this area.
Again, maybe there is some setting somewhere, but I think this probably
related more to the fact that lilypond is postscript in its core.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4851070
Sent from the
priate for PDF generation.
cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4850585
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists
Graham Percival schreef:
The most important thing is the printed output, though, so I've never
really looked into this issue.
there are some PS commands to introduce hinting for line-art, but I've
never bothered to investigate if it might help with this.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTEC
Hello,
I've noticed that Adobe Reader 7.0.7 shows head and stem of a quarter
note as two separate items - a small notch at the point where the
stem is attached to the head. As the notch stays the same size on the
screen, even when zooming in to 6400%, I doubt it is really there. I
have yet to
PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: barline problem
Doubt its a problem with my PDF viewer. I tried the experiment on my laptop
too. Same problem. Using Adobe reader 7.0.7. When its zoomed in to 100%,
the line is not broken. Zoomed in to 400% the line is st
Acrobat's
display with a small pinch of salt.
- Original Message -
From: "Dewdman42" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: barline problem
Doubt its a problem with my PDF viewer. I tried the experiment on my
laptop
too. Sa
On 13-Jun-06, at 1:15 AM, Dewdman42 wrote:
Printing looks fine. I tried installing 3 different third party pdf
viewers,
none of which looked any good at all..they all had drastic line
connection
and line width issues. Perhaps someone can explain this to me or tall
me a
pdf viewer that knows
been rendered
by lilypond. I have created many PDF's myself through other programs that
looked WYSIWYG perfect. Apparantly lilypond is not that greatest at
producing PDF's. The printer output was excellent though.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-proble
On 12-Jun-06, at 11:34 PM, Dewdman42 wrote:
Doubt its a problem with my PDF viewer. I tried the experiment on my
laptop
too. Same problem. Using Adobe reader 7.0.7.
You're probably using the same program on your laptop as well, so it
could well be a problem with your PDF viewer.
Whe
ridiculously too thick and some are really thin.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4841663
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
On 12-Jun-06, at 9:09 PM, Dewdman42 wrote:
I am a brand new Lilypond user. I installed Lilypond and ran the test
.ly
file that is included with the installation. It produced a PDF file.
however, I notice that the barlines stick up above and stick down
below just
a little bit beyond the top
bug or some mistake or something? I tried both the current stable version
and the current beta..they both do it. What gives? I'm running on Windows
XP.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/barline-problem-t1778120.html#a4840744
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User for
49 matches
Mail list logo
