On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:21:49AM +0300, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
> On Sun 03 Oct 2010, 14:52 Graham Percival wrote:
> > 2b. if you can't spot the problem, point them at
> > http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
> This is rather for bug-lilypond, i'd say. In lilypond-user it is customary to
> sen
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I greatly prefer having short snippets inline. That way I can read them in
> my mail reader, rather than having to open them to see what's up.
Ditto. If I ever want to compile one, I have a dedicated ~/toto.ly
file that I only use for pastin
On Sun 03 Oct 2010, 14:52 Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:37:59PM +0100, James Lowe wrote:
>
> > 1. Open Email
> > 2. Read Email. Spot problem. Reply
>
> Yes.
mutt! all-in-one, whether example is attached or inline =O]
((2Graham: i know you know,))
> > If someone sends an ly
On 10/3/10 6:36 AM, "Martin Tarenskeen" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
>> There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version number
>> should be in inverted commas "", and you
>> have "arpeggi" which I assume should be arpeggio.
>
> I personally
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:37:59PM +0100, James Lowe wrote:
> 1. Open Email
> 2. Read Email. Spot problem. Reply
Yes.
> If someone sends an ly file that is umpty-thrumpty lines long
let's add one more point:
2b. if you can't spot the problem, point them at
http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
Hello,
On 03/10/2010 13:36, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote:
There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version
number should be in inverted commas "", and you
have "arpeggi" which I assume should be arpeggio.
I personally would prefer it i
On 3 October 2010 14:36, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
> I personally would prefer it if lilypond snippets and example code in this
> mailinglist were posted as separate attachement(s) to the mail. I then just
> simply can save the snippet to disk. Now I first have to copy and paste the
> lilypond co
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote:
There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version number
should be in inverted commas "", and you
have "arpeggi" which I assume should be arpeggio.
I personally would prefer it if lilypond snippets and example code in this
mailingl
Thanks, and sorry for not having provided a excellent snippet. The errors don't
appear in my full score and complete part, so 2.13.35 will do the harp part
well I think.
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.or
slurs in the output have a lot of space to cross,
and to my eye LilyPond does a fair job of fitting them in.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
To: lilypond-user
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 12:09 PM
Subject: bad cross-staff slurs
Hello,
A
Hello,
A person reported that in the following harp passage of mine, the slurs are
blurred with the notes. He read the score generated by 2.13.24, so: Is it still
wrong in 2.13.35? How to solve the issue?
Regards
Haipeng
\version 2.13.35
headsOn = \sequential {
\override Dots #'transparent =
11 matches
Mail list logo
