Pedro Kröger wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The change just made it to the website. The text and link point to
2.7.19.1 but the actual version at
http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/autopackage/ is 2.7.19 so the
link doesn't work.
my mistake, I just corrected it. than
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The change just made it to the website. The text and link point to
> 2.7.19.1 but the actual version at
> http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/autopackage/ is 2.7.19 so the
> link doesn't work.
my mistake, I just corrected it. thanks.
Pedro Kröger
Paul Scott wrote:
Pedro Kröger wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is the web site behind or is 2.7.14.1 the latest safe version?
the web is behind, I just updated it.
The change just made it to the website. The text and link point to
2.7.19.1 but the actual version at
http:
Pedro Kröger wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is the web site behind or is 2.7.14.1 the latest safe version?
the web is behind, I just updated it.
Any reason I shouldn't install 2.7.19 for testing purposes?
none I can think of.
Thanks.
2.7.19 may have a
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is the web site behind or is 2.7.14.1 the latest safe version?
the web is behind, I just updated it.
> Any reason I shouldn't install 2.7.19 for testing purposes?
none I can think of.
Pedro
___
lilypond-user
I see that the autopackage for 2.7.19 exists but the web site only show
2.7.14.1. Is the web site behind or is 2.7.14.1 the latest safe version?
Any reason I shouldn't install 2.7.19 for testing purposes?
Thanks,
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mai
