Re: automatic partwriter

2017-10-19 Thread Urs Liska
Hi David, I just stumbled over this thread (basically when working on my mail server ;-) ) And although I didn't have the opportunity to look into all of this (hey, could you consider writing a blog post about it?) one though struck my mind. No idea whether it's worthwile but perhaps it gives

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-10-07 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi all, > I've attached the beginning of an automatic partwriter. Here's an improved version of the partwriter which adds a few constraints to get smoother results. The four voices may not all move in the same direction, and upper parts must move to the closest available chord m

Instrument registrations (was: automatic partwriter)

2017-09-28 Thread David Kastrup
David Nalesnik writes: > Hi Kieren, > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: >> Hi David, >> >>> I wanted to share something which I think illustrates the power that >>> Lily has over other popular notation software. >> >> o_O >> >> Amazing. >> >> 1. You are a force of natu

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-09-28 Thread David Nalesnik
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Karlin High wrote: > On 9/28/2017 8:34 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > I appreciate this. The positive feedback I've gotten is encouraging > me to keep going with this. > > > Fully understanding this piece is going to stretch my understanding of both > music theory

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-09-28 Thread Sam Bivens
Hi David, I agree, this is *really* impressive work! Have you experimented with including intentional errors as a type of error-detection exercise for students? Take care, Sam ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-09-28 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Sam, On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Sam Bivens wrote: > Hi David, > > I agree, this is *really* impressive work! I appreciate this. The positive feedback I've gotten is encouraging me to keep going with this. > > Have you experimented with including intentional errors as a type of > error

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-09-28 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Kieren, On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi David, > >> I wanted to share something which I think illustrates the power that >> Lily has over other popular notation software. > > o_O > > Amazing. > > 1. You are a force of nature. Well, diligent/obsessive in fits and

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-09-27 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi David, > I wanted to share something which I think illustrates the power that > Lily has over other popular notation software. o_O Amazing. 1. You are a force of nature. 2. The timing on this share couldn't have been better: in the next few months, I'll be giving presentations/lectures at

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-09-27 Thread Ben
On 9/26/2017 10:59 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to share something which I think illustrates the power that > Lily has over other popular notation software. > > I spend a lot of time teaching partwriting to undergraduate music > majors, and recently, suddenly, it occurred to me

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-09-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I've attached the beginning of an automatic partwriter. [...] Nice! Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

automatic partwriter

2017-09-26 Thread David Nalesnik
stress "correct" as opposed to "artistic" or even "interesting") would naturally be the province of computers. A computer should be able to instantly provide all possible solutions to a problem with so many constraints. I've attached the beginning of an automati