Re: another fingering question

2004-08-25 Thread Cameron Horsburgh
> I don't know whether I'd be better off hard-coding the entire range of > notes - about three octaves or more - or specifying all the open notes > then specifying the fingering from the open note above. This has been an interesting discussion! I hadn't thought about the implications of hard-writin

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes If I get the time, I'll code it myself (I want to learn) but what it would need is some way of specifying the fundamental note (eg for a trumpet I would choose concert B flat below middle C), and once you've Try writing a

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Han-Wen Nienhuys > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> > > >> >^ and _ are provided as a shorthand for: > >> > > >> > \override Script #'direction = UP/DOWN > >> > >> My only comment here is that (when using \mar

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >^ and _ are provided as a shorthand for: > > \override Script #'direction = UP/DOWN My only comment here is that (when using \markup) it does not appear to be a shorthand for *override*. It se

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >^ and _ are provided as a shorthand for: > > > > \override Script #'direction = UP/DOWN > > My only comment here is that (when using \markup) it does not appear to > be a shorthand for *override*. It seems to be a shorthand for *specify*. > In other words, an ov

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes David Raleigh Arnold writes: -4 4- and 3-4 are all very useful in fingering, and they have been requested and used for years. Why should c_-5 c^5- or c_5-4 remain a problem? You're just trolling, right? Anyway, there's t

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-12 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
David Raleigh Arnold writes: > -4 4- and 3-4 are all very useful in fingering, and they have been > requested and used for years. Why should c_-5 c^5- or c_5-4 remain a > problem? You're just trolling, right? Anyway, there's this tiny implementation detail called language specification that som

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-12 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 05:07 pm, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > You have a syntax error, which is easily remedied. > > Instead of c-5, you change to c_5 to force the markup below and c^5 > to force it above. > > You never use c_-5. -4 4- and 3-4 are all very useful in fingering, and they have been

another fingering question

2004-08-11 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
You have a syntax error, which is easily remedied. Instead of c-5, you change to c_5 to force the markup below and c^5 to force it above. You never use c_-5. Carl Carl D. Sorensen Department of Mechanical Engineering Brigham Young University 435 CTB Provo, UT 84602 801-422-6397FAX 801-422-

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-10 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Hopefully, you can find the answer at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Articulations.html#Articulations If not, we should clarify the manual. /Mats korneel bernolet wrote: how to add the fingerings BELOW the notes ? (in the bottom piano staff) i tried eg. c_-5 bu

another fingering question

2004-08-10 Thread korneel bernolet
how to add the fingerings BELOW the notes ? (in the bottom piano staff) i tried eg. c_-5 but this does not work... any suggestions ? thx a lot korneel _ New: download more than 350.000 tracks starting from € 0,80! http://entertainmen