2013/10/29 Simon Bailey :
> Hiya,
>
>
>> On 29 Oct 2013, at 23:36, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>
>> As you may have noticed, we recently reorganized the repository and
>> now it should work more or less like you described. I hope you'll
>> like it!
>
> i checked out the repository in exactly this way o
Am 29.10.2013 23:56, schrieb Simon Bailey:
Hiya,
On 29 Oct 2013, at 23:36, Janek Warchoł wrote:
As you may have noticed, we recently reorganized the repository and
now it should work more or less like you described. I hope you'll
like it!
i checked out the repository in exactly this way on
Hiya,
> On 29 Oct 2013, at 23:36, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>
> As you may have noticed, we recently reorganized the repository and
> now it should work more or less like you described. I hope you'll
> like it!
i checked out the repository in exactly this way on Sunday. ;) (i needed the
stem atta
Hi Simon,
2013/10/16 Urs Liska :
> Am 16.10.2013 15:08, schrieb Simon Bailey:
>> []
>> so basically, is there an intention at some point, to create a
>> _library_ version of the snippets github (i.e. leave the examples in
>> the files as usage documentation, but commented out so that they don'
Am 16.10.2013 15:08, schrieb Simon Bailey:
hi janek,
following wilbert's recent release of frescobaldi 2.0.11, of which the
preview debugging features interest me, i was thinking about your
repository a bit.
i already have a long-standing workflow in place -- of which
frescobaldi is not a part
hi janek,
following wilbert's recent release of frescobaldi 2.0.11, of which the
preview debugging features interest me, i was thinking about your
repository a bit.
i already have a long-standing workflow in place -- of which
frescobaldi is not a part -- and i have accumulated a library of
intere
Hi all,
following a discussion about LSR and its limitations (e.g. problems
with snippets written for development versions of LilyPond), I've
created a new place to store useful pieces of LilyPond code:
http://github.com/openlilylib/snippets (scroll down to see description)
Note that this is *no
