Hi Luc,
I don't understand why you can't just call the alto "tenor" and call the
tenor "alto". Then just assign tenor to the upper staff and alto to the
lower. Then you can just rename your sections and reassign them to the
proper staff later if you need to change it.
Or are you trying to get s
On 27.12.2007 22:17, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> although this doesn't meet your objective of keeping the
> parts distinct.
Yes, it is sad but true: there is no solution for this problem at the
moment. The only hope seems to be that some volunteer writes a new
partcombine implementation...
Luc
___
mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Luc Saffre
> Sent: 27 December 2007 18:59
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: alto stems up, tenor stems down
>
>
> On 27.12.2007 20:26, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > There is no 'pr
On 27.12.2007 20:26, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> There is no 'proper' way of doing this, unfortunately.
> The recent discussion on \partcombine which you can
> see in the archives points out the problems with this.
> Of course, you can always simply insert \stemUp and
> \stemDown commands in the alto l
Hello,
in a songbook for SATB choir, I'd like to save paper by turning the alto
stems up and the tenor stems down whenever this is possible. For many
songs, this would make the result more dense without being less readable.
If you look at the attached satb2.pdf:
- the first line is the default ou
