Re: alterations above and below turns, pralls ...

2004-04-11 Thread Edward Sanford Sutton, III
On Sunday April 11 2004 12:26, Roland Goretzki wrote: > Hello list, hello Edward, > > You wrote: > > On Sunday April 11 2004 09:54, Roland Goretzki wrote: > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > b > > > ~ > > > # > > > > > > Meanwhile I did this cunstruct with text-markups, but this seems to be > > >

Re: alterations above and below turns, pralls ...

2004-04-11 Thread Roland Goretzki
Hello list, hello Edward, You wrote: > On Sunday April 11 2004 09:54, Roland Goretzki wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > > b > > ~ > > # > > > > Meanwhile I did this cunstruct with text-markups, but this seems to be > > very ugly, and I think, it might be possible, to program this as a > > feat

Re: alterations above and below turns, pralls ...

2004-04-11 Thread Edward Sanford Sutton, III
On Sunday April 11 2004 09:54, Roland Goretzki wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder, if it is possible to determine, if there are alterations of > the notes above or/and below e.g. turns and pralls. > > For example, with the following key-signature > > \key e \minor > > there would be a note a with a turn

alterations above and below turns, pralls ...

2004-04-11 Thread Roland Goretzki
Hi, I wonder, if it is possible to determine, if there are alterations of the notes above or/and below e.g. turns and pralls. For example, with the following key-signature \key e \minor there would be a note a with a turn, written out as a bes a gis a then there it is necessary (and i