Re: alist problem

-Original Message- From: David Kastrup To: David Sumbler CC: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: alist problem Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 15:37:21 +0100 David Sumbler writes: > IR 2.19.82 shows the following amongst the settings for TrillSpanner: > > bound-details (list):

Re: alist problem

David Sumbler writes: > IR 2.19.82 shows the following amongst the settings for TrillSpanner: > > bound-details (list): > '((left (text # > "scripts.trill") > (Y . 0) > (stencil-offset -0.5 . -1) > (padding . 0.5) > (attach-dir . 0)) > (left-broken

alist problem

IR 2.19.82 shows the following amongst the settings for TrillSpanner: bound-details (list): '((left (text # "scripts.trill") (Y . 0) (stencil-offset -0.5 . -1) (padding . 0.5) (attach-dir . 0)) (left-broken (end-on-note . #t)) (right (Y . 0))) If

Re: scm: (apply and …) and alist problem

've never used apply so I'm no help there... Cheers, -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/scm-apply-and-and-alist-problem-tp174487p174512.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: scm: (apply and …) and alist problem

Am 14.04.2015 um 00:10 schrieb Simon Albrecht: 1) Why can’t ‘apply’ be used with ‘and’ (defined-all.ly example file)? 2) Why does assoc-get return #f instead of a list in the second example file? Help is much appreciated. Yours, Simon I think 'and' is not a 'proc' in the sense of what 'ap

scm: (apply and …) and alist problem

Hello, once more I have to come up with two scheme problems. I attached small examples. 1) Why can’t ‘apply’ be used with ‘and’ (defined-all.ly example file)? 2) Why does assoc-get return #f instead of a list in the second example file? Help is much appreciated. Yours, Simon \version "2.19

Re: space-alist problem

> What defines the distance between a time signature and the next note > *with an accidental* (in addition to the TimeSignatures > `extra-spacing-width')? I would expect that the `first-note' (or > `next-note', if set) element of a TimeSignature's `space-alist' > handles this case also, but this

space-alist problem

[Resending to lilypond-user, since the issue might be interesting to more people...] What defines the distance between a time signature and the next note *with an accidental* (in addition to the TimeSignatures `extra-spacing-width')? I would expect that the `first-note' (or `next-note', if set)