On 02/01/2013 07:06 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
That would necessarily involve a diagrams for each brand/model combination ?
Otherwise it would be a nightmare to control which key to show and which not.
And to do it so others really can follow it we should name it accordingly, e.g.:
"Selmer-Priv
On 02/01/2013 07:06 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Ia there any rule in using Trademarks and mentioning these in the documentation?
This could open up a quagmire because several models of regular clarinets also
have key additions
What key additions did you have in mind? For example low F vent
On 31 Jan 2013, at 17:48 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 01/30/2013 09:42 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
That is why the "low-bass-clarinet" stencil exists. That is (as I
reverse
engineer it) intended for bass-clarinet toward low-C (the concert
model) whereas
the "bass-clarinet" is the lo
On 01/30/2013 09:42 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
That is why the "low-bass-clarinet" stencil exists. That is (as I reverse
engineer it) intended for bass-clarinet toward low-C (the concert model) whereas
the "bass-clarinet" is the low-Ees (streetmodel).
Well, my point is that "low-bass-clarinet"
Hi Joseph,
On 29 Jan 2013, at 23:22 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
-- more realistic key shapes and placement for the diagrams (this
is a
minor quibble, but nice if it can be done);
-- an option to display unused as well as used keys (Wim's request);
E.g. with a property '(showal
On 01/29/2013 10:29 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Just a note to say thank you to all those who want to make this code better.
It's tough for me to take it any farther with my non-expert knowledge of
woodwind instruments, but I would be glad to answer any and on questions
addressed to lilypond-
On 29 janv. 2013, at 22:17, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 01/29/2013 09:50 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
6. Lot's of models have a right-hand low-ees key (with the thumb), There
is no
such key. Wishlist.
>>>
>>> Not recent French models, in my experience, but I agree it's o
On 01/29/2013 10:46 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Uhh, never too old for a challenge, as I see it the register key is also
inherited, so it is one and the same definition. Can give it a try. What were
you thinking about?
Just a register key that looks like an actual clarinet register key, rather
On 29 Jan 2013, at 22:17 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 01/29/2013 09:50 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Since you're finding it relatively straightforward to play with the
Scheme code, can I put in a feature request -- any chance of fixing
the shape of the register key for clarinet/bass cl
On 29 Jan 2013, at 22:29 , m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Just a note to say thank you to all those who want to make this code
better. It's tough for me to take it any farther with my non-expert
knowledge of woodwind instruments, but I would be glad to answer any
and on questions addressed to
On 01/29/2013 09:50 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
6. Lot's of models have a right-hand low-ees key (with the thumb), There is no
such key. Wishlist.
Not recent French models, in my experience, but I agree it's often found. The
trouble is its placement is not uniform.
The Selmer privilege has on
On 29 Jan 2013, at 16:06 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
For example, as I recall, Selmer bass clarinets used to have the
right-hand little finger low Eb on the _upper_ rank of keys, with a
low C#/Db on the lower rank. Buffet have traditionally had it the
opposite way round.
FYI, they ch
On 01/28/2013 11:54 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Me too, but having individual control satifies everyone.
Agreed. :-)
The big challenge will be to find some optimum which satifies the multitude of
brands and models. I've played on two brands, three models and these were all
different, I checke
On 01/28/2013 01:54 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Agreed, but for a series showing e.g. a scale it would be nice to have similar
diagrams, so I would like to control the behaviour myself.
Personally I prefer to see all the keys when it's a visual diagram.
That said, I think my preference _in gen
Minimal example attached, in diagram 3 lots of keys are gone.On 28 Jan 2013, at 12:03 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:On 01/28/2013 11:34 AM, Jeffrey Trevino wrote:It should be pointed out that it's a common notational practice to hide theunused non-center keys in fingering diagrams; this behavior
On 01/28/2013 11:34 AM, Jeffrey Trevino wrote:
It should be pointed out that it's a common notational practice to hide the
unused non-center keys in fingering diagrams; this behavior is idiomatic.
Common, but not ubiquitous or standard, I'd say.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Eluze wrote:
p
> reproduce
> this behavior!
>
> Eluze
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Woodwind-Fingering-diagrams-problem-tp140182p140200.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _
d.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Woodwind-Fingering-diagrams-problem-tp140182p140200.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
I'm trying to get some prints with the woodwind fingering diagrams on
it. When I use the basic diagram, all defined keys show up, but as
soon as I enter one hole to be used some of the keyholes (not of the
central one to six holes, but especially on the side keys) disappear
from the d
19 matches
Mail list logo
