;
> lilypond-user@
> >
>> Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 10:55 AM
>> Subject: Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10
>>
>>
>> I've tried to reproduce this on my Windows 10 machine using Process
>> Monitor to check file operations. I get an init
On 2016-09-14 12:07, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Anders Eriksson"
To: "Knut Petersen" ; "lilypond-user"
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10
I've tried to reproduce this on
2016-09-14 12:07 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Anders Eriksson"
> To: "Knut Petersen" ; "lilypond-user" <
> lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 10:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Version 2.18 vs.2
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Eriksson"
To: "Knut Petersen" ; "lilypond-user"
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10
On 2016-09-11 11:38, Knut Petersen wrote:
2.19.42.1 4.7
2.19
Anders Eriksson writes:
> On 2016-09-10 22:16, tisimst wrote:
>> Just thought I'd add my two cents. I'm using Windows 8 and I only see a small
>> speed increase between older versions and 2.19.47.
>>
>> Using:
>>
>> \repeat unfold 200 { \tuplet 5/4 { c'4 d' e' f' g' } }
>>
>> and compiling in "pu
On 2016-09-11 11:38, Knut Petersen wrote:
2.19.42.1 4.7
2.19.43.1 29.8
Don't know how to proceed...
Do you use downloaded versions or do you build lilypond from the
source code?
I downloaded from http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/
__
On 2016-09-10 22:16, tisimst wrote:
Just thought I'd add my two cents. I'm using Windows 8 and I only see a small
speed increase between older versions and 2.19.47.
Using:
\repeat unfold 200 { \tuplet 5/4 { c'4 d' e' f' g' } }
and compiling in "publish" mode (i.e., no point-and-click links) I
Just thought I'd add my two cents. I'm using Windows 8 and I only see a small
speed increase between older versions and 2.19.47.
Using:
\repeat unfold 200 { \tuplet 5/4 { c'4 d' e' f' g' } }
and compiling in "publish" mode (i.e., no point-and-click links) I get the
following results:
2.18.2 - 6
On 2016-09-08 19:03, Michael Rivers wrote:
I'm not sure it's due to a change between v2.19.46 and 47. For most of the
summer, I had been running an older development version and an older version
of Frescobaldi for a while, and they were running fine. I hadn't run
Lilypond in a few weeks, and in
I'm not sure it's due to a change between v2.19.46 and 47. For most of the
summer, I had been running an older development version and an older version
of Frescobaldi for a while, and they were running fine. I hadn't run
Lilypond in a few weeks, and in the meantime Windows 10 updated to the
"Annive
Hi Pierre,
the problem has been reported by Mac users, as a change between v2.19.46
and .47, in that now it takes so long on every run instead of only the
very first. Presumably because the font cache is always being rebuilt.
Maybe it’s the same problem?
Best, Simon
On 06.09.2016 16:59, Pie
Same problem here. I didn't save any compile times before the update for
comparison, but Lilypond just crawls now. I was compiling a one-page piece
last night, which used to go by in a flash, and now it takes a good 10
seconds.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.
Maybe an simpler compilation:
\version "2.18.2" { c' }
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.18.2 [Untitled]...
Processing `c:/users/pierre/appdata/local/temp/frescobaldi-zjscau/tmpaf0a6q/
document.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number of pages
Hi All,
This morning Win10 forced me to do an update which has last more than an
hour, and then another one few hours later (15mn "only").
Since then, I have a very long run delay with LP v2.19.
For example, the snippet in this thread :
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-MulitMeasureRe
14 matches
Mail list logo
