Re: fermata position (was: Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score)

2002-11-05 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:18:43PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:55:21 +0100 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:29:19PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > > > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 23:03:13 +0100 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwar

Re: fermata position (was: Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score)

2002-11-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:55:21 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:29:19PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 23:03:13 +0100 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > > > But: why did v1.4.12 choose to put the fermata on the bass

fermata position (was: Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score)

2002-11-02 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:29:19PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 23:03:13 +0100 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > > But: why did v1.4.12 choose to put the fermata on the bass part correctly > > under the note but v1.6.5 choose (wrongy) to put the fermata above t

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:15:23PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 18:47:37 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald > Hoellwarth) wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:45:35PM +0100, Ronald Hoellwarth wrote: > > > Thanks. That helped. But now I'm facing another problem: I had some > > >

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I told lilypond that the soprano is \VoiceOne, alto \VoiceTwo, tenor > \VoiceOne and bass \VoiceTwo and thought therefore it should (as v1.4.12 > did it) place the fermata on the right side of the Staffs. > > Was there a change between v1.4.12 and v1.6.5 in regard to th

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 23:03:13 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > But: why did v1.4.12 choose to put the fermata on the bass part correctly > under the note but v1.6.5 choose (wrongy) to put the fermata above the > note into the realm of the tenor? > > I told lilypond that the sopr

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 18:47:37 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:45:35PM +0100, Ronald Hoellwarth wrote: > > Thanks. That helped. But now I'm facing another problem: I had some > > fermata in the score. With v1.4.12 I just had to do d4-\fermata on the > >

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Rune Zedeler
Ronald Hoellwarth wrote: OK. replying to my own post is an indicator that I didn't try hard enough - but the fermata-problem is solved: d4_#'(music "scripts-dfermata") But this is an Ugly Solution (tm). If you sometimes in the future should want to i.e exchange the alto and the tenor part the

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:45:35PM +0100, Ronald Hoellwarth wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 11:23:04AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I recommend that you upgrade to 1.6.x > > > > Thanks. That helped. But now I'm facing another problem

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 02:17:26PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > > 2. To indicate which voice should be the one with the leading melody > > > > there are small arrows point diagonal from top left to right bottom > > > > (soprano, tenor) and from bottom left to top right (alto, bass) > > > > to

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 03:08:19PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:00:15 +0100 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > > > 1. I've a SATB-Score and the first StaffGroup is indented but I want it > > to start at the left margin - like the rest of the Staffgroups. >

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 11:23:04AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I recommend that you upgrade to 1.6.x > > ie, add > > deb ftp://ftp.lilypond.org/pub/LilyPond/binaries/debian woody > > to your /etc/apt/sources.list Thanks. That helpe

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Mats Bengtsson
> > > 2. To indicate which voice should be the one with the leading melody > > > there are small arrows point diagonal from top left to right bottom > > > (soprano, tenor) and from bottom left to top right (alto, bass) > > > towards the first note-body that should be the melody. Can I create > > >

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-11-01 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I recommend that you upgrade to 1.6.x. ie, add deb ftp://ftp.lilypond.org/pub/LilyPond/binaries/debian woody . to your /etc/apt/sources.list Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all

Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-10-31 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:00:15 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > I just started to work with lilypond (I use the one that comes with > Debian "Woody" - v.1.4.12) and could do much of that what I wanted by > the help of the manual and the examples. I recommend that you upgrade to 1

Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score

2002-10-31 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
Hello, I just started to work with lilypond (I use the one that comes with Debian "Woody" - v.1.4.12) and could do much of that what I wanted by the help of the manual and the examples. Only two things are remaining unsolved an neither the Manual nor the FAQ could offer any help to me on those two