On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Please do. It would be nice enhancement to have more control over
> leger positions.
OK. Perhaps I should have made the issue's title more clear, then.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1292
Cheers,
Valentin
__
On 29 September 2010 08:23, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> What do we do from this point? Is your snippet worth LSRizing as is,
I'm happy to add it to LSR, even if it doesn't work with legers.
> or should I open a tracker page anyway?
Please do. It would be nice enhancement to have more control
OK inside stave
> f fis g
> gis1 a ais b
> c1 des d es
> e1 f ges g
> as1 a bes ces
> }
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Staff
> \remove "Accidental_engraver"
> \remove "Time_signature_engraver"
> }
> }
>
> Cheers
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Any mapping is possible: it's up to the user to write the function
> which maps pitches to position, though in this case ly:pitch-semitones
> will suffice due to rounding.
Hi Neil,
What do we do from this point? Is your snippet worth LSRizi
On 27 September 2010 01:34, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Yes, that's what Neil was describing, but I'd like to add
> one wrinkle. Maybe I'm wrong, but it's my understanding
> that the wide staff-spaces are not supposed to be twice as
> big, but 1.5 times. So I don't think it's quite the same
> dimensi
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> Looking at the picture, it seems to me the only part
>> which LilyPond doesn't support is the special leger lines
>> below the stave: though the middle C superficially looks
>> like a G, it's positioned as if it were an E, but with
>> the first leger missing (so the leger l
>>> http://www.klangreihenmusik.at/skriptum-zwoelftonnotenschr-01kl.php3
>>
>> It's not supported. Please send a feature request to the
>> bug-lilyp...@gnu.org mailing list.
>
> Looking at the picture, it seems to me the only part which LilyPond
> doesn't support is the special leger lines below
On 26 September 2010 16:19, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> does anyone know whether or not lilypond supports the twelve-tone
>> notation system of J.M. Hauer? To point out what I mean, here's a
>> link where the differences between several 12-tone notation systems
>>
>> http://www.klangreihenmusik.at/skriptum-zwoelftonnotenschr-01kl.php3
>
> I'm assuming you mean the note names, right?
I rather think he means the specific staff appearance (with groups of
two and three lines).
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing
On Sep 25, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Nikolausius wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> does anyone know whether or not lilypond supports the twelve-tone notation
> system of J.M. Hauer? To point out what I mean, here's a link where the
> differences between several 12-tone notation sy
> does anyone know whether or not lilypond supports the twelve-tone
> notation system of J.M. Hauer? To point out what I mean, here's a
> link where the differences between several 12-tone notation systems
> are shown and the system of J.M. HAuer is being ex
Hi there,
does anyone know whether or not lilypond supports the twelve-tone notation
system of J.M. Hauer? To point out what I mean, here's a link where the
differences between several 12-tone notation systems are shown and the
system of J.M. HAuer is being explained:
12 matches
Mail list logo
