Xavier Scheuer writes:
> On 10 March 2013 17:27, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> The problem with that approach is that it does not adapt to LilyPond
>> choosing to use wider or narrower spacing depending on the page layout.
>
> The problem with the other approach is that it involves more (and more
>
On 10 March 2013 17:27, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> The problem with that approach is that it does not adapt to LilyPond
> choosing to use wider or narrower spacing depending on the page layout.
The problem with the other approach is that it involves more (and more
complex) code.
Would an "\afterGr
Kevin Patrick Barry writes:
> My preferred method for placing a turn between notes is to tweak the
> X-offset, viz.
>
> c -\tweak #'X-offset #2 \turn
>
> and modify the value accordingly. Seems a bit simpler than the snippet
> solution (which seems to produce a smaller turn than the default
> art
Keith OHara writes:
> David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>
>> I don't think I get your point.
>
> It was that \once\hideNotes works fine.
>
> We do not need the complexities of \tweak or the new \single until we start
> digging into chords.
>
>
>> Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>>
>> > David Kastrup
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> I don't think I get your point.
It was that \once\hideNotes works fine.
We do not need the complexities of \tweak or the new \single until we start
digging into chords.
> Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >> Keith OHara
Keith OHara writes:
> David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>>
>> > \new Voice \relative c'' {
>> > << f4. {s4 \once\hideNotes f8\turn\noBeam } >> g16-. a-. }
>>
>> \once\hideNotes makes me a bit queasy here since it will affect all
>> notes at the same timestep.
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>
> > \new Voice \relative c'' {
> > << f4. {s4 \once\hideNotes f8\turn\noBeam } >> g16-. a-. }
>
> \once\hideNotes makes me a bit queasy here since it will affect all
> notes at the same timestep.
No cause for nausea.
The effe
Payne
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 10:02 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Turn placed between notes
See attached graphic. Quite a number of these in the score (Brahms Sextet Op
18). At the moment I'm creating them like so:
\version "2.17.13"
\relative f'' {
f4.^\m
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Nick Payne
> wrote:
>> See attached graphic. Quite a number of these in the score (Brahms
>> Sextet Op
>> 18).
>
> you can use a clever function written by David K. While it results in
> different (i'd say a bit worse) spacing, it makes in
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
> See attached graphic. Quite a number of these in the score (Brahms Sextet Op
> 18).
you can use a clever function written by David K. While it results in
different (i'd say a bit worse) spacing, it makes input code
infinitely more readable:
at
Keith OHara writes:
> Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes:
>
>> have to fiddle with the value of halign each time to get
>> the turn centred between the notes. Is there a more automated way of
>> positioning the turn?
>
> Parallel music. Then I can think in terms of the timing of the turn,
Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes:
> have to fiddle with the value of halign each time to get
> the turn centred between the notes. Is there a more automated way of
> positioning the turn?
Parallel music. Then I can think in terms of the timing of the turn, rather
than the spacing. Usual
See attached graphic. Quite a number of these in the score (Brahms
Sextet Op 18). At the moment I'm creating them like so:
\version "2.17.13"
\relative f'' {
f4.^\markup { \halign #-3.5 { \musicglyph #"scripts.turn" } } g16 a |
}
but with the value of halign hard coded, with differing note v
13 matches
Mail list logo
