Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes:
>
> Werner wrote:
> >
> > (My opinion: That should be default layout.)
> >
> The opinion of the main LilyPond developers is to use hand-engraved
> scores by the main German publishers as the inpiration when deciding on
> the layout, see for example
>
http://
Werner wrote:
(My opinion: That should be default layout.)
The opinion of the main LilyPond developers is to use hand-engraved
scores by the main German publishers as the inpiration when deciding on
the layout, see for example
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond-lear
Mats wrote:
> I believe the LilyPond default layout agrees well with common
> typesetting standard. However, LilyPond is a very flexible tool so
> you can get another layout if you prefer. One method is to use the
> trick described in "Polymetric notation" as a starting point, which
> could result
It sounds as if you have stumbled across some font related bug. See the
section
on "Time Signature" in the manual, for an example of what layout LilyPond
should give. What LilyPond version and what operating system do you use?
Werner wrote:
Hello,
I used 4/4 instead of C via
\override Staff.T
Hello,
I used 4/4 instead of C via
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'()
but the cyphers were huge.
So I added
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'font-size = #-2
But while the cyphers now are smaller, the numerator-4 stands still very close
on the top of the denominator-4 without any gap, bo
