Re: Tie/slur variable thickness vs shape

2020-05-22 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Yes it does, thank you Kevin! Cheers, Pierre Le ven. 22 mai 2020 à 09:21, Kevin Barry a écrit : > On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 07:16 +0200, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using Abraham's function: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1028 > > However, the overrides are killed by the shape

Re: Tie/slur variable thickness vs shape

2020-05-22 Thread Kevin Barry
On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 07:16 +0200, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > Hi, > I'm using Abraham's function: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1028 > However, the overrides are killed by the shape adjustment: > > Any idea how to avoid that? > TIA, cheers, > Pierre Hi Pierre, Does this solve the probl

Tie/slur variable thickness vs shape

2020-05-21 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi, I'm using Abraham's function: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1028 However, the overrides are killed by the shape adjustment: %% \version "2.20.0" #(define (variable-bow-thickness min-l max-l min-t max-t) (lambda (grob) (let (;; get the procedure to calculate the control-points