2016-06-05 15:18 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :
> On 04.06.2016 12:51, Thomas Morley wrote:
>>
>> Otoh, it may be worth considering making `calc-blot` public. It's a
>> simple c/p from bar-line.scm and I was annoyed by the need to do so
>> before.
>
>
> I agree. Defining custom bar lines is not so far-
On 04.06.2016 12:51, Thomas Morley wrote:
Otoh, it may be worth considering making `calc-blot` public. It's a
simple c/p from bar-line.scm and I was annoyed by the need to do so
before.
I agree. Defining custom bar lines is not so far-fetched a use case, and
this seems an odd necessity.
Best
2016-06-04 4:52 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Hi Harm,
>
> Absolutely perfect.
>
> Many thanks.
Glad I could help.
> Worthy of the LSR don’t you think?
Not sure about this.
The changes in the bar-line-interface (since 2.17.5) were motivated by
giving users the chance to create their own custom b
Hi Harm,
Absolutely perfect.
Many thanks.
Worthy of the LSR don’t you think?
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2016-06-03 15:40 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
> When using tick barlines:
>
> \set Timing.defaultBarType = "'"
>
> how does one adjust the thickness, and the length?
>
> Andrew
You can't. Thickness and length are taken from
ly:staff-symbol-line-thickness and ly:staff-symbol-staff-space.
You
When using tick barlines:
\set Timing.defaultBarType = "'"
how does one adjust the thickness, and the length?
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
