Re: Tempo marking doesn't avoid cross-staff slur

2024-01-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> This issue belongs into the group of the many cross-staff problems. >> AFAICS, we don't have this particular case covered, so please file >> an issue in the LilyPond tracker. > > For reference, it's : https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6688 Thanks! Werner

Re: Tempo marking doesn't avoid cross-staff slur

2024-01-11 Thread Knute Snortum
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:40 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > I found a weird behavior -- I don't know if it's worthy of an issue > > or not, but here it is: > > > > The tempo marking will not avoid a slur that goes from staff to > > staff. Here is a snippet that shows the problem, and I've attach

Re: Tempo marking doesn't avoid cross-staff slur

2024-01-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I found a weird behavior -- I don't know if it's worthy of an issue > or not, but here it is: > > The tempo marking will not avoid a slur that goes from staff to > staff. Here is a snippet that shows the problem, and I've attached > an image of it: [...] This issue belongs into the group of

Tempo marking doesn't avoid cross-staff slur

2024-01-07 Thread Knute Snortum
I found a weird behavior -- I don't know if it's worthy of an issue or not, but here it is: The tempo marking will not avoid a slur that goes from staff to staff. Here is a snippet that shows the problem, and I've attached an image of it: \version "2.25.12" one = \relative { \tempo "Allegro ma