Re: Still \char # problem..

2005-09-19 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People using SToccata.TTF or other non-unicode symbol fonts would find it helpful to be able to specify the character they want using \char #137 for example. Beyond that, \char is an existing feature; if its behaviour were consistent with LilyPond's switch to utf-8, then

Re: Still \char # problem..

2005-09-18 Thread stk
Mehmet Okonsar wrote: > This one gives only an empty ps file no pdf.. I can't understand? > - > \version "2.7.10" { \relative c' > c1^\markup {\char #65 } > } > - Mats Bengtsson wrote: > why do you want to specify the character code? Why not > insert whatever symbol you w

Re: Still \char # problem..

2005-09-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Mehmet Okonsar wrote: This one gives only an empty ps file no pdf.. I can't understand? - \version "2.7.10" { \relative c' c1^\markup {\char #65 } } \char is deprecated. I'll remove it from 2.7 -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _

Re: Still \char # problem..

2005-09-18 Thread Mats Bengtsson
why do you want to specify the character code? Why not insert whatever symbol you want directly with your text editor? /Mats = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology

Still \char # problem..

2005-09-18 Thread Mehmet Okonsar
This one gives only an empty ps file no pdf.. I can't understand? - \version "2.7.10" { \relative c' c1^\markup {\char #65 } } - Best Regards, Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer www.okonsar.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilyp