Simon Albrecht mail.de> writes:
> >> Other than adding \shape overrides
> > Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?
>
> Because they have to be done for each slur individually?
> At any rate, it would be easier to, say, \override Slur.attachment =
> #'Stem (as opposed to #'NoteHead).
If you
| My apologies. On further research, the feature to anchor slurs to stems
existed way before I knew of LilyPond, just no longer available.I'm sure I
searched for this for an earlier
project:http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-08/msg00177.html
|
On Wednesday, October 7
On 07.10.2015 14:50, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Javier,
Other than adding \shape overrides
Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?
Because they have to be done for each slur individually?
At any rate, it would be easier to, say, \override Slur.attachment =
#'Stem (as opposed to #'NoteHea
Hi Javier,
> Other than adding \shape overrides
Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?
Cheers,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypon
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma
wrote:
> Other than adding \shape overrides, is there a way to tell LP to anchor
> the slurs to the stems instead of noteheads?
>
>
>
> %%---Begin snippet
>
> \version “2.18.2”
>
> <<{ \clef bass 2 }\\{ f'4( e') d'( c') }>>
>
Try:
<<{
\clef b
Other than adding \shape overrides, is there a way to tell LP to anchor the
slurs to the stems instead of noteheads?
%%---Begin snippet
\version "2.18.2"
<<{ \clef bass 2 }\\{ f'4( e') d'( c') }>>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.o
