On 8/29/06, Steve D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:22:44PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> Trevor Bača wrote:
> >Yes, exactly. The notes can be separately articulated, with separate
> >accidentals and so on. What the notes share will be spanning stems and
> >a single bea
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:22:44PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> Trevor Bača wrote:
> >Yes, exactly. The notes can be separately articulated, with separate
> >accidentals and so on. What the notes share will be spanning stems and
> >a single beam.
>
> OK. This is a completely different featu
Trevor Bača wrote:
Yes, exactly. The notes can be separately articulated, with separate
accidentals and so on. What the notes share will be spanning stems and
a single beam.
OK. This is a completely different feature than what Steve is looking
for. It's also quite a bit easier, I suspect.
-
On 8/28/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača wrote:
> QUESTION: will the proposed cross-staff implementation path enable
> cross-staff stemming and beaming between *nonadjacent* staves (eg, 1st
> violins and basses, passing over the 2nd violins, violas and cellos)?
on 2nd
Trevor Bača wrote:
QUESTION: will the proposed cross-staff implementation path enable
cross-staff stemming and beaming between *nonadjacent* staves (eg, 1st
violins and basses, passing over the 2nd violins, violas and cellos)?
on 2nd thought, isn't this completely different from x-staff stemmin
Trevor Bača wrote:
> Well, if Steve or Vivian or Hans or somebody is willing to help out,
> then I'm willing to pitch in on the sponsoring too.
>
> I'm about to have cross-staff stuff all over some piano music and also
> between different *string* staves as well. So a question.
>
> QUESTION: will
On 8/23/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I once made an estimate for doing x-staff chords, for 400 EUR. I think
>> that would be the most difficult task. If the stems + noteheads work
>
Trevor Bača wrote:
On 8/22/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I once made an estimate for doing x-staff chords, for 400 EUR. I think
that would be the most difficult task. If the stems + noteheads work
correctly, adding arpeggios and ties should be relatively easy.
For re
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:29:49PM -0500, Trevor Bača wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hello,
> >I once made an estimate for doing x-staff chords, for 400 EUR. I think
> >that would be the most difficult task. If the stems + noteheads work
> >correctly, adding a
On 8/22/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I once made an estimate for doing x-staff chords, for 400 EUR. I think
that would be the most difficult task. If the stems + noteheads work
correctly, adding arpeggios and ties should be relatively easy.
For reference, I insert wh
Hello,
I once made an estimate for doing x-staff chords, for 400 EUR. I think
that would be the most difficult task. If the stems + noteheads work
correctly, adding arpeggios and ties should be relatively easy.
For reference, I insert what I wrote to Hans Forbrich:
**
Hello Hans,
I've had
I have in the past got Lilypond to do what you describe. The cross-staff chords are documented in the manual, although I agree the mechanism for achieving this is a bit clumsy (extending the stem from one of the chords.) I could imagine that to allow something like your example () could be a bit of
I know that cross-staff beaming has been mentioned periodically on the
LilyPond lists.
It would be great, for the sake of piano and other polyphonic instrument
scores, for there to exist in LilyPond some mechanism that would allow
for chords to change staff, perhaps like single-note melodies alrea
13 matches
Mail list logo
