Hi Nick,
>
> When I build your example on 2.15.41, all the stems are missing. Happens
> both with your original code and David's suggested amendment.
>
Yes, this happened for me too on 2.15.41. It works on 2.15.39,
2.15.40, and 2.15.42, though.
-David
__
On 29/07/12 07:14, Thomas Morley wrote:
Hi,
after an idea by Mike Solomon
-> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00421.html
I've worked on complex chords with splayed stems.
Seems to work so far.
When I build your example on 2.15.41, all the stems are missing.
Hi Harm,
> overriding 'before-line-breaking returns the NoteColumn as X-parent of Script:
Aha--so it does.
> The approach via 'after-line-breaking works!
>
>
> Many thanks,
> Harm
Glad I could help!
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-u
(ly:grob-object nc 'note-heads
(newline)(display "nc-- ")(display nc)
(set! (ly:grob-parent grob X)
(car nh
log:
GNU LilyPond 2.15.39
Processing `splayed-stems-post.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
n
Hi Harm,
This is cool!
The problem is in the definition of splayedStemChord: NoteHead is the
X-parent of Script, so you're missing a step en route to NoteColumn.
Also, it turns out you need to override 'after-line-breaking rather
than 'before-line-breaking.
> splayedStemChord =
> #(define-music-
Hi,
after an idea by Mike Solomon
-> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00421.html
I've worked on complex chords with splayed stems.
Seems to work so far.
But if I add an articulation it moves to an unexpected NoteHead.
TextScript doesn't move!
I tried to se
On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:08 AM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 20 December 2011 07:57, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
>>
>>> Caio Barros gmail.com> writes:
> We have a snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
Thanks. It is close
Hello,
On 20 December 2011 07:57, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
>
>> Caio Barros gmail.com> writes:
We have a snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
>>> Thanks. It is close indeed.
>>
>> You might want to omit the extra splayed stem
On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> Caio Barros gmail.com> writes:
>>> We have a snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
>> Thanks. It is close indeed.
>
> You might want to omit the extra splayed stem. The chord is
> still ugly, but draws less attention to its ugliness.
Caio Barros gmail.com> writes:
> > We have a snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
> Thanks. It is close indeed.
You might want to omit the extra splayed stem. The chord is
still ugly, but draws less attention to its ugliness.
\relative g''' { < ges! g! \tweak #'X-offset #1.2 a>4 e d
eters.
2011/12/19 James
> Hello,
>
> On 19 December 2011 20:14, Caio Barros wrote:
> > Hi, is there some way to write splayed stems? (I don't know if this is
> the
> > correct name, but it is how Finale name it)
>
> We have a snippet =
>
> http://lsr.d
Hello,
On 19 December 2011 20:14, Caio Barros wrote:
> Hi, is there some way to write splayed stems? (I don't know if this is the
> correct name, but it is how Finale name it)
We have a snippet =
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
'Complex Chord'.
Seems to be sim
Hi, is there some way to write splayed stems? (I don't know if this is the
correct name, but it is how Finale name it)
The best I could do so far is this:
\relative g''' {
\once \override Stem #'rotation = #'(45 0 0)
\once \override Stem #'X-offset = #2
13 matches
Mail list logo
