2016-12-04 17:50 GMT+01:00 Carl Sorensen :
>
>
> On 12/3/16 7:12 AM, "PMA" wrote:
>
>>
>>With such a simple solution (my using 'r' instead & setting
>>rests to transparent), I'm not inclined to pursue the issue.
>
> I suspect (although I haven't tried it) that using 'r' and setting the
> stencil t
My apologies, Simon. Just now registered your first request.
Will reform.
On 12/05/2016 03:42 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
I don’t understand why you keep going off-list with this.
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https:
I don’t understand why you keep going off-list with this.
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
In this code, the spacer rest takes up space in the proportional spacing
code. (modified from
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/proportional-notation)
So I'm not sure what happened to your code.
%%%
\score {
<<
\new RhythmicStaff {
c2 16 16 16 16 \tuplet 5/4 { 16 1
On 05.12.2016 18:58, PMA wrote:
On 12/05/2016 11:51 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/5/16 8:52 AM, "PMA" wrote:
On 12/04/2016 12:40 PM, PMA wrote:
Come to think of it, "*spacer rest*" instead actually comes closer --
assuming anyway somewhere a strict definition.
P
..."closer", i.e., in de
On 12/04/2016 11:50 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
...
Until I reread the manual I had forgotten that spacer rests are really
called "invisible rests", which exactly describes what they do. Perhaps
we should change the documentation to have most of the text read
"invisible rest".
Well, to my mind, t
On 12/3/16 7:12 AM, "PMA" wrote:
>
>With such a simple solution (my using 'r' instead & setting
>rests to transparent), I'm not inclined to pursue the issue.
I suspect (although I haven't tried it) that using 'r' and setting the
stencil to #f would produce exactly the same output as using s.
Hi David,
> how did you implement those functions?
Below is a snippet that contains the three functions, and an example usage.
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19.49"
\language "english"
ignoreH =
#(define-music-function (parser location item) (symbol-list-or-music?)
#
On Dec 3, 2016, at 8:19 AM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Right now, I have the syntactic sugar \ignoreH, \ignoreV, and \ignore (both H
> and V) which I put in front of objects when I want to adjust their effect on
> spacing — but it would be nice to have a built-in and less verbose way of
> doi
Hear hear!
P
On 12/03/2016 10:19 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi all,
Or perhaps have a distinction between things like { s4 } and { c4\rest } ?
I think we should distinguish between “skips” [which take up no space,
horizontal or vertical], “spacers” [which take up space, but are invisible],
Hi all,
> Or perhaps have a distinction between things like { s4 } and { c4\rest } ?
I think we should distinguish between “skips” [which take up no space,
horizontal or vertical], “spacers” [which take up space, but are invisible],
and visible objects (like rests, notes, etc).
My suggestion:
On 12/3/2016 5:06 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> I think it would be a valid request to have s-rests take up the
> respective space with proportional spacing.
Or perhaps have a distinction between things like { s4 } and { c4\rest } ?
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
On 12/03/2016 06:26 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Simon Albrecht writes:
On 03.12.2016 02:36, PMA wrote:
The score setup already calls for proportional
notation.
I think it would be a valid request to have s-rests take up the
respective space with proportional spacing.
I don't think s rests sh
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 03.12.2016 02:36, PMA wrote:
>> The score setup already calls for proportional
>> notation.
>
> I think it would be a valid request to have s-rests take up the
> respective space with proportional spacing.
I don't think s rests should mess with the spacing of other no
On 03.12.2016 12:06, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 03.12.2016 02:36, PMA wrote:
The score setup already calls for proportional
notation.
I think it would be a valid request to have s-rests take up the
respective space with proportional spacing.
P.S. I don’t know any other use cases, though, so I
On 03.12.2016 02:36, PMA wrote:
The score setup already calls for proportional
notation.
I think it would be a valid request to have s-rests take up the
respective space with proportional spacing. Would you mind sending a
concise request, with a small example, to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org?
Best,
On 12/02/2016 08:36 PM, PMA wrote:
On 12/02/2016 07:08 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 02.12.2016 23:39, PMA wrote:
Hi All!
I notice that the spacer command (e.g., "s4"), though
always accounting rightly for the TIME it commandeers
(here a quarter-note's worth), does not always insert
ACTUAL HORI
On 12/02/2016 07:08 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 02.12.2016 23:39, PMA wrote:
Hi All!
I notice that the spacer command (e.g., "s4"), though
always accounting rightly for the TIME it commandeers
(here a quarter-note's worth), does not always insert
ACTUAL HORIZONTAL SPACE in the score.
How can
On 02.12.2016 23:39, PMA wrote:
Hi All!
I notice that the spacer command (e.g., "s4"), though
always accounting rightly for the TIME it commandeers
(here a quarter-note's worth), does not always insert
ACTUAL HORIZONTAL SPACE in the score.
How can I ensure that it'll do that too? (I.e., what
s
19 matches
Mail list logo
