On 10/04/11 23:33, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Nick Payne"
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Slurs are better than ties at automatically avoiding
collisions
On 10/04/11 22:09, Phil Holmes wrote:
Have you tested whether i
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Payne"
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Slurs are better than ties at automatically avoiding collisions
On 10/04/11 22:09, Phil Holmes wrote:
Have you tested whether it actually avoids the beam better, or if it&
On 10/04/11 22:09, Phil Holmes wrote:
"Nick Payne" wrote in message
news:4da16be1.7010...@internode.on.net...
See below. If I have a tie between the two Gs in the top voice, it
collides with the beam. If I fake the tie with a slur, it automatically
avoids the beam.
\version "2.13.58"
\relativ
"Nick Payne" wrote in message
news:4da16be1.7010...@internode.on.net...
See below. If I have a tie between the two Gs in the top voice, it
collides with the beam. If I fake the tie with a slur, it automatically
avoids the beam.
\version "2.13.58"
\relative c'' {
<< { g'2 ~ g }
\\ { s1 }
Dear Nick,
Looks like a good thing to try, when in difficulty.
There isn't any collision avoidance occurring, of course; slurs are
usually placed further away from the notes than ties.
If you make the middle voices vacant, you can see this.
Regards,
bruys
\version "2.12.3"
\relative c'' {
<<
See below. If I have a tie between the two Gs in the top voice, it
collides with the beam. If I fake the tie with a slur, it automatically
avoids the beam.
\version "2.13.58"
\relative c'' {
<< { g'2 ~ g }
\\ { s1 }
\\ { b,8 g a b ~ b a b a }
\\ { g,2 g }
>>
}
\relative c'' {
<< {
