If you don't explicitly write out the duration of a note,
it gets the same duration as the previous note; c16 d e f.
It's exactly the same with chords; c16 e f
In your ex1, both chords get the same duration as the
first c'.
(By the way, have you learnt about \relative yet? It seems that
you would
Thanks to all who answered.
I promise to read the manual more thoroughly!
:-)
But I still don't understand why ex1 works!?
Thomas
> Hello,
>
> why does the 2nd example not work?
>
> ex1:
> --
> \score
> {
> \notes
> {
> c' c' ~
> }
> }
> \paper {}
> --
>
> ex2:
>
> --
> \score
> {
> \not
"Thomas Scharkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> \score
> {
> \notes
> {
> c' c' ~
> }
> }
> \paper {}
<...> is CHORD syntax (since 2.0), and chord durations
should be attached to the full chord, like <...>8.
Feri.
___
Lilypond-user mailing lis
It's not a tie, but a chord syntax question :-)
> c' c' ~
Try:
8
Bert
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
A 21/01/04 23:23:58
"Thomas Scharkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> why does the 2nd example not work?
> c' c' ~
>
Logically, the 8 must be outside the chord, so this:
c' c' 8 ~
(unespected digit, expecting notename_pich, or '>')
joseluis
_
Hello,
why does the 2nd example not work?
ex1:
--
\score
{
\notes
{
c' c' ~
}
}
\paper {}
--
ex2:
--
\score
{
\notes
{
c' c' ~
}
}
\paper {}
--
ex2 produces:
"syntax error, unexpected DIGIT, expecting NOTENAME_PITCH or '>':
c' c' ~ "
Thank you,
Thomas
Version 2.1.11 on Cygwin/Win
