Re: Shift & rests

2008/1/9, Luc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I posted this question 2 days ago but I got no response These things happen :) No problem, I just wanted to be sure somebody reads it... Isn't a pitched rest supposed to shift to the right or - vice versa - a chord relative to the rest? Why would it

Re: Shift & rests

2008/1/9, Luc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I posted this question 2 days ago but I got no response These things happen :) > Isn't a pitched rest supposed to > shift to the right or - vice versa - a chord relative to the rest? Why would it be shifted to the *right*? the rest and the chord are simultan

Re: Shift & rests

Sorry, the attachemnt failed to upoad I posted this question 2 days ago but I got no response - maybe the attachement will illustrate what I mean! I would appreciate any hint about shifting rests horizontally. Thnx! Luc Isn't a pitched rest supposed to shift to the right or - vice versa -

Re: Shift & rests

lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shift---rests-tp14645928p14702152.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabbl

Shift & rests

% Isn't a pitched rest supposed to shift to the right or - vice versa - a chord relative to the rest? \version "2.11.37" \paper { ragged-right =##t } << { < d' g' > } \\ { \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #2. b \rest } << { \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #2. < d' g' > } \\ { r }