Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-08 Thread David Kastrup
Federico Bruni writes: > 2013/12/8 Thomas Morley > >> 2013/12/5 Federico Bruni : >> >> > When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch >> > combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account). >> >> Hi Federico, >> >> How should this ever work? >> Thinkin

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-08 Thread Federico Bruni
2013/12/8 Thomas Morley > 2013/12/5 Federico Bruni : > > > When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch > > combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account). > > Hi Federico, > > How should this ever work? > Thinking of modulations/enhormonics. > Do y

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-08 Thread Federico Bruni
2013/12/7 David Kastrup > Federico Bruni writes: > > > It really depends on the music and kind of guitar. > > Alternate tunings are used mostly on acoustic guitar and especially in > > fingerstyle and flatpicking tecniques. > > I know very few pieces for electric guitar which use alternate tunin

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-08 Thread David Kastrup
Federico Bruni writes: > It really depends on the music and kind of guitar. > Alternate tunings are used mostly on acoustic guitar and especially in > fingerstyle and flatpicking tecniques. > I know very few pieces for electric guitar which use alternate tunings > (usually 6th string dropped down

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-07 Thread Thomas Morley
2013/12/5 Federico Bruni : > When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch > combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account). Hi Federico, How should this ever work? Thinking of modulations/enhormonics. -Harm

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-07 Thread Federico Bruni
2013/12/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen > What I meant was: what is required for the a minimal first useful > user experience. Would a hardcoded tuning do, so that we can > implement a tuning choosing mechanism later? > > yes, stringTunings = #guitar-tuning would be ok for most guitarists > > It is quite

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-05 Thread David Kastrup
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: >>> Can we do away with choosing the tuning, isn't there a common tuning >>> for guitar that > 90% of guitars use? >> >> Can we do away with the command line, isn't there a common desktop >> environment that >90% of computer users use? > > What I meant was: what is requi

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-05 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ecame a success story ultimately. What I mean is that I have some code for this. However, I like to find a short path to any true useful application of Schikkers List and go that path first. After dabbling a bit with text input, I decided to work on numerous usability problems, implement slur

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-05 Thread David Kastrup
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Federico Bruni writes: > >> Sure, but the thing is: why showing the text input if you cannot >> modify it? > > Why enable editing the text input as long as it's next to useless > because it's slow and buggy? Your request is noted, though. "Next to useless" is O(1) of

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-04 Thread Federico Bruni
2013/12/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen > Federico Bruni writes: > > > I'm not a coder, so nothing. > > I was just thinking that I may test it better if I could run it on my > > computer. > > Okay...thanks for the offer! I'll think about it. Because development > is so slow the code is only available to th

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
r changes > quicker? Yes, that was the main reason for me to create the prototypes of Schikkers List that were released three years ago. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://Avat

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Federico Bruni writes: > I'm not a coder, so nothing. > I was just thinking that I may test it better if I could run it on my > computer. Okay...thanks for the offer! I'll think about it. Because development is so slow the code is only available to the actual developers for now. > I see that t

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-03 Thread Federico Bruni
2013/12/3 Jan Nieuwenhuizen > Federico Bruni writes: > > > So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no > > source code anywhere. > > Unfortunately we can test the demo only > > Why is that unfortunate? The demo is really all there is, currently. > What would you do

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-03 Thread Noeck
… and another question: Can the Schikkers List code be found somewhere? As there are quite some ideas coming up on the page linked below, it would probably be interesting how Schikkers List solved some issues. Cheers, Joram >> See https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issu

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-03 Thread Noeck
Am 03.12.2013 17:46, schrieb Urs Liska: > Am 03.12.2013 17:20, schrieb Johan Vromans: >> Federico Bruni writes: >> >>> I felt like working on a "reversed Frescobaldi": >>> input in the GUI, output text. :-) >> So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi. +1 > See https://github.com/wb

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-03 Thread Urs Liska
Am 03.12.2013 17:20, schrieb Johan Vromans: Federico Bruni writes: I felt like working on a "reversed Frescobaldi": input in the GUI, output text. :-) So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi. See https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/284 If any part of that rings a be

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-03 Thread Johan Vromans
Federico Bruni writes: > I felt like working on a "reversed Frescobaldi": > input in the GUI, output text. :-) So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi. -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Federico Bruni writes: > So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no > source code anywhere. > Unfortunately we can test the demo only Why is that unfortunate? The demo is really all there is, currently. What would you do with the code? > I did a quick test. Funny,

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-03 Thread Federico Bruni
2013/12/3 Jan Nieuwenhuizen > Federico Bruni writes: > > > It was hosted on github years ago, but now I see that last update is 3 > years > > ago. > > Yes. > > So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no source code anywhere. Unfortunately we can test the demo only

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Mark Knoop writes: > There seems to be a bug - see attached screenshot. Key signatures are > inserted always as if in treble clef rather than appropriate to the > selected clef. Thanks! Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-02 Thread Mark Knoop
There seems to be a bug - see attached screenshot. Key signatures are inserted always as if in treble clef rather than appropriate to the selected clef. -- Mark Knoop <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-02 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Federico Bruni writes: > It was hosted on github years ago, but now I see that last update is 3 years > ago. Yes. > The demo is not working on Chromium 31.0.1650.57 It was down. Please try again? Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com

Re: Schikkers List (was: Re: Supporting my work on LilyPond financially)

2013-12-02 Thread Federico Bruni
2013/12/3 Noeck > > This is *exactly* why I've been playing/experimenting with GUI > > backends/frontends since 2004. If you haven't done so, please have > > a look at Schikkers List > > > > http://lilypond.org/schikkers > > This looks reall

Re: Schikkers List

2013-12-02 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Noeck writes: >> http://lilypond.org/schikkers > > This looks really cool! (Has it improved a lot or is the html5 demo new, > compared to last year? The last time I looked, it didn't work for me) Thanks. I found some time this spring and it improved a lot. I haven't had any time to work on

Schikkers List (was: Re: Supporting my work on LilyPond financially)

2013-12-02 Thread Noeck
> This is *exactly* why I've been playing/experimenting with GUI > backends/frontends since 2004. If you haven't done so, please have > a look at Schikkers List > > http://lilypond.org/schikkers This looks really cool! (Has it improved a lot or is the html5 demo n

Re: [Schikkers-List]: demo feedback

2013-08-20 Thread Paul Morris
On Aug 20, 2013, at 4:02 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Thank you! Now all I need is more hackers and users/people giving > feedback, like you :-) Glad to help. :-) >> One thing that is counter-intuitive (maybe you're already aware of >> this), is that selecting a different note duration from

Re: [Schikkers-List]: demo feedback

2013-08-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Paul Morris writes: > Nice progress on Schikkers list! It seems like it is coming along > well. Thank you! Now all I need is more hackers and users/people giving feedback, like you :-) > One thing that is counter-intuitive (maybe you're already aware of > this), is that sele

[Schikkers-List]: demo feedback

2013-08-19 Thread Paul Morris
Nice progress on Schikkers list! It seems like it is coming along well. One thing that is counter-intuitive (maybe you're already aware of this), is that selecting a different note duration from the palette changes the currently selected note. My expectation was that it would only app

[ANNOUNCE] Schikkers-List v0.0.3 -- the Look Less Ikli release

2011-03-19 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I'm happy to announce Schikkers-List v0.0.3 -- the Look Less Ikli release Although it's mostly useless, be sure to get it while it's hot http://lilypond.org/schikkers-list/download/schikkers-list-0.0.3-4.linux-x86.sh http://lilypond.org/schikkers-list/download/schikke