Re: Retrieving 'tweaks from a grob

2016-07-25 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Don't do that. The acknowledger is the place for _setting_ > properties, and of course a first acknowledger has no chance to see > properties set by a second acknowledger. Instead, use the > acknowledger to _record_ the grobs. Then you use the > process-acknowledged hoo

Re: Retrieving 'tweaks from a grob

2016-07-25 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Hi all, > > in the ScholarLY package we're attaching a (newly defined) property > 'input-annotation to a grob, either through an implicit \once \override > or a \tweak, depending on the invocation syntax: > > The attached file > annotate.ly > shows both ways, first the ove

Retrieving 'tweaks from a grob

2016-07-25 Thread Urs Liska
Hi all, in the ScholarLY package we're attaching a (newly defined) property 'input-annotation to a grob, either through an implicit \once \override or a \tweak, depending on the invocation syntax: The attached file annotate.ly shows both ways, first the override, then the tweak. Today I final