Re: Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Caio Giovaneti de Barros
That's nice! It can be very useful for writing instructions for the players. Adding the rest and dots engravers to the Dynamics context was the solution of choice for me, though. On 26-01-2016 18:15, Thomas Morley wrote: For the record, we have a rest-markup-command. https://sourceforge.ne

Re: Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Thomas Morley
2016-01-26 17:49 GMT+01:00 Caio Giovaneti de Barros : > So far the only way I could think of is to add the rest as a markup, but (1) > this doesn't write the rest in the middle and (2) there is no way to > differentiate a whole note rest and a half note rest: For the record, we have a rest-markup

Re: Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Caio Giovaneti de Barros
Just a little addendum, I'm just tested this: If you want dotted rests, you need to include "Dots_engraver" and "Dot_column_engraver": \new PianoStaff << \new Staff { s4 e'4 s2 e'4 } \new Dynamics \with { \consists "Rest_engraver" \consists "Dots_engraver" \consists "Dot_column_engraver"

Re: Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Urs Liska
Am 26.01.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Caio Giovaneti de Barros: > I think that's it. You saved me again, Pierre! Yes, definitely better than my suggestion. And semantically more appropriate. > > On 26-01-2016 14:57, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: >> \new PianoStaff << >> \new Staff { s4 e'4 s2 e'4 }

Re: Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Caio Giovaneti de Barros
On 26-01-2016 14:56, Urs Liska wrote: I don't think so. But you can try using a regular Staff and adjust it by hiding/omitting everything you don't want: Yes, i like this idea, but it still takes too much space, that's why I thought about using the Dynamics context. The ideal solution w

Re: Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Caio Giovaneti de Barros
I think that's it. You saved me again, Pierre! On 26-01-2016 14:57, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: \new PianoStaff << \new Staff { s4 e'4 s2 e'4 } \new Dynamics \with { \consists "Rest_engraver" } { r4 s4 r2 s4 r1 } \new Staff { \clef F s4 c s2 c4 } >> ___

Re: Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi Caio, Here's a simple way: \version "2.19.35" \new PianoStaff << \new Staff { s4 e'4 s2 e'4 } \new Dynamics \with { \consists "Rest_engraver" } { r4 s4 r2 s4 r1 } \new Staff { \clef F s4 c s2 c4 } >> Cheers, Pierre 2016-01-26 17:49 GMT+01:00 Caio Giovaneti de Barros : > Is t

Re: Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Urs Liska
Am 26.01.2016 um 17:49 schrieb Caio Giovaneti de Barros: > Is there a way to write rests in the Dynamics context? (or something > like it) I don't think so. But you can try using a regular Staff and adjust it by hiding/omitting everything you don't want: \score { \new PianoStaff << \new

Rests in Dynamics context

2016-01-26 Thread Caio Giovaneti de Barros
Is there a way to write rests in the Dynamics context? (or something like it) I'm engraving a piece for piano in which there are rests used by both staves. It would be much cleaner for the musician to read some of the rests between staves (same as dynamics in the Dynamics context). So far th