Tomas Valusek wrote:
Hello,
Thunderbird doesn't include a "Reply to list" command, and since all
the messages having in "TO:" or "Cc:" fields a string "lilypond" are
automatically put into appropriate folder, it would be nice if
lilypond lists followed the practice of other mailing lists, whe
David Feuer wrote:
On 4/15/06, Tomas Valusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
original message. I'm tired of constant checking if my reply really goes
to lilypond list, and since all other lists follow the practice
mentioned above, there's no reason for me to change my habits.
Most other li
>> From: Tomas Valusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
>>
>> so nothing's going to change? Than you're going to lose a good deal of
>> ordinary Windows users, since neither Otlook, Outlook Express nor
>> Thunderbird contain "Reply to list" option ...
Sorry
Hello,
so nothing's going to change? Than you're going to lose a good deal of
ordinary Windows users, since neither Otlook, Outlook Express nor
Thunderbird contain "Reply to list" option ...
Tom V.
Gilles Sadowski napsal(a):
Hello.
Thunderbird doesn't include a "Reply to list" command,
Hello.
>
> Thunderbird doesn't include a "Reply to list" command,
Then, you could file a bug ("wishlist") report, requesting
the feature.
> to lilypond list, and since all other lists follow the practice
> mentioned above, there's no reason for me to change my habits.
>
It depends. If the l
On 4/15/06, Tomas Valusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> original message. I'm tired of constant checking if my reply really goes
> to lilypond list, and since all other lists follow the practice
> mentioned above, there's no reason for me to change my habits.
Most other lists I've been on follow t
Hello,
Thunderbird doesn't include a "Reply to list" command, and since all the
messages having in "TO:" or "Cc:" fields a string "lilypond" are
automatically put into appropriate folder, it would be nice if lilypond
lists followed the practice of other mailing lists, where "Reply"
replies to
andrea valle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Obviously Tomas is not asking about his keyboard bindings. He means
> that when he uses normal reply function he replies to the list member
> and not to the list. Well, I don't like it very much too as I want to
> keep the thread on the list and not to
On 4/15/06, andrea valle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Obviously Tomas is not asking about his keyboard bindings. He means
> that when he uses normal reply function he replies to the list member
> and not to the list. Well, I don't like it very much too as I want to
> keep the thread on the list a
Obviously Tomas is not asking about his keyboard bindings. He means
that when he uses normal reply function he replies to the list member
and not to the list. Well, I don't like it very much too as I want to
keep the thread on the list and not to reply in some sense "privately".
This mail is
Tomas Valusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I've several times pressed ctrl+r to reply to LilyPond maillist
> message, but since I forget to check recipients, they never get to
> maillist again, only to sender of a mail I'm replying to. Would it be
> possible to omit "reply-to" field in
Hello,
I've several times pressed ctrl+r to reply to LilyPond maillist message,
but since I forget to check recipients, they never get to maillist
again, only to sender of a mail I'm replying to. Would it be possible to
omit "reply-to" field in messages coming from lilypond mailing lists?
To
12 matches
Mail list logo
