Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-21 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 21 January 2012 23:28, Thomas Morley wrote: > > I played around with your function. And now I wonder why your function > is not the default behaviour. I can understand that (although I am not sure about what should be the "standard notation"). If you think it should be the default behaviour,

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-21 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi David, 2012/1/20 David Nalesnik : > Hi again-- > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:22 PM, David Nalesnik > wrote: >> >> Hi Harm! >> >> I'm sure this could be modified to target the note that governs stem >> direction. >> > > I'm not sure if my reasoning is correct (or if this all is particularly > u

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-20 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:34:21AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: G, I wrote a reply yesterday, but _atain_ only replied to one person instead of the list. > >> Hi Frank, > >> > >> 2012/1/17 Frank Steinmetzger : > >> > >> > Is there an automatic way to resolve this, i.e. that all "ness" > >> > s

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-19 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi again-- On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:22 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Harm! > > I'm sure this could be modified to target the note that governs stem > direction. > > I'm not sure if my reasoning is correct (or if this all is particularly useful), but the function in the attached file attempts to

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-19 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Harm! On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Thomas Morley < thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > 2012/1/19 David Nalesnik : > > Hi Frank, > > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Morley > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Frank, > >> > >> 2012/1/17 Frank Steinmetzger : > >> > >> > Is t

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-19 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi David, 2012/1/19 David Nalesnik : > Hi Frank, > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Morley > wrote: >> >> Hi Frank, >> >> 2012/1/17 Frank Steinmetzger : >> >> > Is there an automatic way to resolve this, i.e. that all "ness" >> > syllables are >> > properly aligned again? > > > It appear

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-19 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Frank, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Morley < thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Frank, > > 2012/1/17 Frank Steinmetzger : > > > Is there an automatic way to resolve this, i.e. that all "ness" > syllables are > > properly aligned again? > It appears the text will be aligned

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-19 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi Frank, 2012/1/17 Frank Steinmetzger : > Hello gurus > > I already wrote a whole paragraph to describe my problem, but an image is far > simpler.  Please see the attached screenshot to get an idea of my problem.   > The > "ness" syllables are not aligned to one another, because alto and bass are

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-17 Thread James
Hello, On 17 January 2012 03:45, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Hello gurus > > I already wrote a whole paragraph to describe my problem, but an image is far > simpler.  Please see the attached screenshot to get an idea of my problem.   > The > "ness" syllables are not aligned to one another, becaus

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-16 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Hello gurus I already wrote a whole paragraph to describe my problem, but an image is far simpler. Please see the attached screenshot to get an idea of my problem. The "ness" syllables are not aligned to one another, because alto and bass are aligned to a single note, whereas soprano and tenor h

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-08 Thread James
Matthew/Xavier On 8 January 2012 20:11, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > On 8 January 2012 20:22, James wrote: >> Xavier, >> >> […] >> >> I tried to use this myself on the first bar of a piece to get a >> 'squashed' hairpin linger by extending the measure but I cannot seem >> to *only* make it affect the

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-08 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 8 January 2012 20:22, James wrote: > Xavier, > > […] > > I tried to use this myself on the first bar of a piece to get a > 'squashed' hairpin linger by extending the measure but I cannot seem > to *only* make it affect the first measure. > > version "2.14.1" > > \relative c' { > \time 3/4 > \

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-08 Thread Matthew Collett
On 9/01/2012, at 8:22 am, James wrote: > I tried to use this myself on the first bar of a piece to get a > 'squashed' hairpin linger by extending the measure but I cannot seem > to *only* make it affect the first measure. > The rest of the measures are also affected. I wonder if you or anyone >

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2012-01-08 Thread James
Xavier, On 14 December 2011 08:37, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > On 14 December 2011 05:31, Nick Payne wrote: >> How can I reduce the width of a single measure? i.e. in the final bar below >> containing the chord of whole notes, I want the width of the measure to be >> just wide enough to contain the

Re: Reduce width of single measure

2011-12-14 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 14 December 2011 05:31, Nick Payne wrote: > How can I reduce the width of a single measure? i.e. in the final bar below > containing the chord of whole notes, I want the width of the measure to be > just wide enough to contain the chord. \once \override Score.SpacingSpanner #'spacing-increme

Reduce width of single measure

2011-12-13 Thread Nick Payne
How can I reduce the width of a single measure? i.e. in the final bar below containing the chord of whole notes, I want the width of the measure to be just wide enough to contain the chord. \version "2.15.20" \language "english" \score { << \new Staff \relative c' { \override Staff