On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 08:30 -0500, Andrew A. Cashner wrote:
> Phil,
>
> You're absolutely right (and I apologize if I suggested you didn't
> know that)---as you say, my terms weren't precise either. In medieval
> and Renaissance theory, C is tempus imperfectum cum prolatione minore,
> "cut C" is
Phil,
You're absolutely right (and I apologize if I suggested you didn't
know that)---as you say, my terms weren't precise either. In medieval
and Renaissance theory, C is tempus imperfectum cum prolatione minore,
"cut C" is tempus imperfectum cum prolatione maiore; in other words,
both are duple
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Phil Holmes"
> To: "Patrick or Cynthia Karl" ,
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:45:46 +0100
> Subject: Re: Variable length bars
> - Original Message - From: "Patrick or Cynthia Karl" <
> pck...@mac.com>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, June
