> I understand your concern with using "Mark" as the basis of the name,
> since while this \editorialMark will often (or always?) include a mark that
> appears on the page, it also contains musical alternatives, so it is not
> merely a type of Mark.
>
>
> Not *alternatives*, basically an individual
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Urs Liska
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:28:05 +0200
> Subject: Re: Advice on naming and structuring scholarLY command
>
> Hi Elaine,
>
> Am 15.06.2018 um 02:21 schrieb Flaming Hakama by Elaine:
>
>
> Actually I think \edmark and \edMarkup (or somethi
This is probably tilting at windmills at this point,
since we seem to have adopted this language,
both in LilyPond and in the ee.
But, from the perspective of our terminology reflecting English language
usage,
I feel compelled to point out that "consist" and "consisted"
are not used in English as
