Re: unfold and tremolo have different math

2008-12-06 Thread Daniel Hulme
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:15:16AM +0100, james wrote: > Sorry, cut off. How does this apply \times 2/3 { c8 c c} \times 2/3 {c c > c} \times 2/3 {c c c} is 9 repetitions of the note c, expressed as a > tremolo, this should be \repeat tremolo 9 \times 2/3 {c8} Does it matter? Your example only d

Re: unfold and tremolo have different math

2008-12-05 Thread Toine Schreurs
> Sorry, cut off. How does this apply \times 2/3 { c8 c c} \times 2/3 > {c c c} \times 2/3 {c c c} is 9 repetitions of the note c, expressed > as a tremolo, this should be \repeat tremolo 9 \times 2/3 {c8} As I understand it, there is no way to make a single tremolo note with a duration of 9/8

Re: unfold and tremolo have different math

2008-12-05 Thread james
Sorry, cut off. How does this apply \times 2/3 { c8 c c} \times 2/3 {c c c} \times 2/3 {c c c} is 9 repetitions of the note c, expressed as a tremolo, this should be \repeat tremolo 9 \times 2/3 {c8} Am 05.12.2008 um 23:52 schrieb Toine Schreurs: See section 1.4.2 Short Repeats: The \repea

Re: unfold and tremolo have different math

2008-12-05 Thread james
How does this apply? Am 05.12.2008 um 23:52 schrieb Toine Schreurs: See section 1.4.2 Short Repeats: The \repeat tremolo syntax expects exactly two notes within the braces, and the number of repetitions must correspond to a note value that can be expressed with plain or dotted notes. Thus, \re

Re: unfold and tremolo have different math

2008-12-05 Thread Toine Schreurs
See section 1.4.2 Short Repeats: The \repeat tremolo syntax expects exactly two notes within the braces, and the number of repetitions must correspond to a note value that can be expressed with plain or dotted notes. Thus, \repeat tremolo 7 is valid and produces a double dotted note, but \repeat t