Malte Meyn,
Perfect!
Thank you.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Malte Meyn
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 11:05 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re
Am 24.11.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
Everything is correct except that the ties do not appear. What is my error?
If you really want these note length values you need a << >> construct
but without \\ because that would create new Voices. The only new Voice
you need is the one
Hwaen Ch'uqi,
Thank you for your reply. I shall try your suggestion.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Hwaen Ch'uqi [mailto:hwaench...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 10:13 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote
Greeting
Greetings Mark,
I believe that ties only work if the notes they are connecting are in
the same voice. In your example, you have called \voiceOne, \voiceTwo,
and \voiceThree. However, your resulting chord is in none of those
voices. Would it be possible to avoid that construct altogether?
Something
--- On Mon, 9/7/09, Robin Bannister wrote:
> From: Robin Bannister
> Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote across staves
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , "lilypond-user"
>
> Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 1:02 AM
> Jonathan Wilkes
> wrote:
> > I see a
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I see a "cross-staff" property for grobs
But this doesn't mean that every sort of grob has it, or uses it.
The file define-grob-properties.scm lists about a dozen grobs which do:
Beam, Stem, Slur, TupletBracket, among others, but not TieColumn.
So your TieColumn
Ok, here's my attempt at getting the cross stave ties from my previous
email. The problem I'm running into is that when I try to set a tie's
vertical position to get it into the RH staff, Lilypond starts a
Vaudeville shtick and moves the staff up beyond my reach (which I guess
is what you norm
--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Robin Bannister wrote:
> From: Robin Bannister
> Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote across staves
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , "lilypond-user"
>
> Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 6:28 PM
> Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > I tried fooling
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I tried fooling around with tieWaitForNote
You didn't show your code, so it's not easy to guess what you tried.
I have no cross-staff experience, but it looks to me like
the cross-staff run is a lot better supported than
the cross-staff chord (where you have to cho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: tieWaitForNote
> Datum: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:05:29 +0200
>
> According to the ChangeLog, this feature was introduced
> in version 2.4.5 so it isn't available in 2.4.4.
>
> /Mats
>
> Martin Bergande wrot
s,
Martin
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Martin Bergande" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kopie: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: tieWaitForNote
Datum: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:56:59 -0700
On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote:
using
ROTECTED]>
> Kopie: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: tieWaitForNote
> Datum: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:56:59 -0700
>
>
> On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote:
>
> > using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to "\set tieWaitForNote = ##t" but the
> > program
&g
On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote:
using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to "\set tieWaitForNote = ##t" but the
program
seems not know this command and supposes typing errors. Can anybody
give me
a hint how to solve this problem?
Are you sure that tieWaitForNote exists in 2.4.4 ? It m
13 matches
Mail list logo
