Re: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-19 Thread Mats Bengtsson
The changes necessary to make lily 2.0 compatible with teTeX 3.0 should be very simple. From the top of my head, make a new directory /usr/share/lilypond/fonts/map/ (or wherever your .../lilypond/fonts/ currently is installed) and put a copy of the file lilypond.map in that directory. On a Debian

Re: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-11 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 17:13, Laura Conrad wrote: > > "Erik" == Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Erik> On 7/11/06, Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > "Erik" == Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Erik> By the way, there are plans to drop the o

Re: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-11 Thread Laura Conrad
> "Erik" == Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Erik> On 7/11/06, Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > "Erik" == Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Erik> By the way, there are plans to drop the old-lyric-combine Erik> compatibility altogether, s

Re: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-11 Thread Erik Sandberg
On 7/11/06, Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Erik" == Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Erik> By the way, there are plans to drop the old-lyric-combine Erik> compatibility altogether, so in order to upgrade to the next Erik> stable version, you'll have to rewrit

Re: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-11 Thread Laura Conrad
> "Erik" == Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Erik> By the way, there are plans to drop the old-lyric-combine Erik> compatibility altogether, so in order to upgrade to the next Erik> stable version, you'll have to rewrite all your old-style Erik> \addlyrics expressions

Re: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-11 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 10 July 2006 15:14, Laura Conrad wrote: > My problem is that I have several major projects that are in lilypond > 2.0. Even where convert-ly performs flawlessly (which it doesn't for > a number of features, like multi-verse vocal music), By the way, there are plans to drop the old-lyr

Re: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-10 Thread Jan Kohnert
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:29:32 -0700, Daniel Johnson wrote > Gentoo currently has support for Lily 2.0.3 -- in fact, that is the > latest version marked "stable" in the Gentoo build tree! But AFAIK it does not even compile anymore. I'm running 2.6 on Gentoo, it works, though it has still some

Re: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-10 Thread Daniel Johnson
Anthony Youngman wrote: If your new system is powerful enough (and no, I haven't any experience of this but I'm planning to do something like this myself :-) Experiment with UML (User Mode Linux) and Gentoo. There's a good chance that if you get a minimal gentoo system running, then tell it to i

RE: tetex 2.5 and lilypond 2.0

2006-07-10 Thread Anthony Youngman
If your new system is powerful enough (and no, I haven't any experience of this but I'm planning to do something like this myself :-) Experiment with UML (User Mode Linux) and Gentoo. There's a good chance that if you get a minimal gentoo system running, then tell it to install the packages you ne