Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-09-02 Thread Gilles
Le Sun, 02 Sep 2012 14:25:07 +0200, Stefan Thomas a écrit: Dear community, for those who are interested: I've found a solution for my problem. I've found it in the older version of copyarticulations.ly It is not the older one. It is the newest. :-) I think you missed my message. http://lis

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-09-02 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear community, for those who are interested: I've found a solution for my problem. I've found it in the older version of copyarticulations.ly skipTiedNotes = #(define-music-function (parser location music)(ly:music?) "Add a special tag in 'tags of second tied notes to forbid articulations to be c

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-09-01 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear community, I know, off course, that the problem with articulations on tied notes is not so important, I'm just curious and maybee I can understand a bit more of the structure of Lilypond. Could it be possible to generally and automatically avoid articulations of the 2nd of two tied notes? I tr

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread Gilles
addTenuto = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?) #{ \copyArticulations {c--} $x #}) The below quoted snippet shows that it works fine, every note gets it's tenuto sign, rests are left without, but: I still searching for a possiblity to let the second of two tied-notes withou

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread David Kastrup
Stefan Thomas writes: > Dear Phil, > Yes I've seen skipArti = \tag #skipCurrentArticulation s1*0 > but do You think this can be used to filter out some > artitulation-events, if needed, automatically? No, no. It was just a side-remark on the implementation, not relevant to your problem. -- Da

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear Phil, Yes I've seen skipArti = \tag #skipCurrentArticulation s1*0 but do You think this can be used to filter out some artitulation-events, if needed, automatically? 2012/8/31 David Kastrup > Stefan Thomas writes: > > > Ok, thanks, I've got it. It's a small bug in copyArticulations, isn't

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread David Kastrup
Stefan Thomas writes: > Ok, thanks, I've got it. It's a small bug in copyArticulations, isn't > it? Yes and no. Expecting a particular duration to be set is probably optimistic after loading an external file. However, there are some internal music expressions defined in copyArticulations, and

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread Stefan Thomas
tes following it to be zero length, unless their length is > explicitly stated. > > -- > Phil Holmes > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Stefan Thomas > *To:* lilypond-user ; David Kastrup > *Sent:* Friday, August 31, 2012 2:54 PM > *Subject:* Re: pro

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread Phil Holmes
: Stefan Thomas To: lilypond-user ; David Kastrup Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 2:54 PM Subject: Re: problem with addTenuto Sorry, I don't understand exactly, what You wanted to say. I see, that I get a file without music when I do \include "copyArticulations.ly" {

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread Stefan Thomas
Sorry, I don't understand exactly, what You wanted to say. I see, that I get a file without music when I do \include "copyArticulations.ly" { c c c c } but what's the idea behind it? Sorry, I don't have any idea in which way this can be useful for special purposes 2012/8/31 David Kastrup > Stefa

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread David Kastrup
Stefan Thomas writes: > Dear David, > what do You mean by > > Actually makes a good case against s1*0 if you follow it with > { c c c c }. \include "copyArticulations.ly" { c c c c } -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-u

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear David, what do You mean by > Actually makes a good case against s1*0 if you follow it with > { c c c c }. > > Dear community, > I found this very useful snippet at > http://gillesth.free.fr/Lilypond/copyArticulations/copyArticulations.ly Actually makes a good case against s1*0 if you follow

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread David Kastrup
Stefan Thomas writes: > Dear community, > I found this very useful snippet at > http://gillesth.free.fr/Lilypond/copyArticulations/copyArticulations.ly Actually makes a good case against s1*0 if you follow it with { c c c c }. > With this it was very to recreate my addTenuto-function in the > f

Re: problem with addTenuto

2012-08-31 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear community, I found this very useful snippet at http://gillesth.free.fr/Lilypond/copyArticulations/copyArticulations.ly With this it was very to recreate my addTenuto-function in the following way: addTenuto = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?) #{ \copyArticulations {c--}