An alternative, which might be at least as easy to use is to
skip the \\ feature and manually specify where you want an
additional voice and where you want stems up or down.
Such an example is provided in Section "6.6.2 Explicitly instantiating
voices" in the manual for version 2.5.xx.
/Mats
> Daniel Johnson wrote:
>
>>r4 c4 ~ << c2 \\ {r8 8 r8 8} >>
>>
>>
>>
> hmm. On second thought, the tie between the C's probably won't work
> here. << \\ >> by default generates new voices, and you can't do
> cross-voice ties. BUT, you can specify voice-names. So the following
> would (theoretica
Daniel Johnson wrote:
>r4 c4 ~ << c2 \\ {r8 8 r8 8} >>
>
>
>
hmm. On second thought, the tie between the C's probably won't work
here. << \\ >> by default generates new voices, and you can't do
cross-voice ties. BUT, you can specify voice-names. So the following
would (theoretically) work:
\
r4 c4 ~ << c2 \\ {r8 8 r8 8} >>
Use backslashes instead of forward. Also, backslashes separate logical
units, so if your second expression consists of more than one note,
you'll need to enclose it in curly-braces as I have shown above.
--Daniel
Sterling Sympatico wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>I am hav
