David B. Thomas wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to
store the voices in different variables?
I'd be happy to do this. Then the syntax could look something like this:
voice1verse1 = { some notes }
voice2verse1 = { more notes }
voice1verse2 = concatenate { still more notes };
voice2verse2 = conca
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
--
parallelMusic =
#(def-music-function (parser location voice-number music) (number? ly:music?)
it's hack, but it's a cool one. With a little polishing, we should be
able to put it in the standard distribution. Wouldn'
of course,
its pretty simple - see attached file. After you finished a piece, do
ctrl+a and copy the content of the cells to a .ly file.
cheers,
john
Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2006, 14:05 -0800 schrieb Jay Hamilton, Sound and
Silence:
> John-
> Could you go into this alittle more. I'm using OOo al
"-DeeT (sent by Nabble.com)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Lilypond manual explains well how to code this way:
>
> staff1, all measures
> staff2, all measures
> staff3, all measures
>
> I'd prefer to have this organization in the source:
>
> staff1,measure-group1
> staff2,measure-group1
> staf
On 18-Jan-06, at 2:15 AM, -DeeT (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
I'm a newcomer to lilypond, having previously used abc. One thing I
find vexing is how to enter scores so it is easy to see all the staves
on the screen at the same time during coding (i.e. in the source
code).
See sly at
http://
Well, I don't know if Lilypond provides something like this. What I do
sometimes is using a spreadsheet editor (OOo Calc, Excel) with one cell
per bar. With this method, you are not limited to one dimension, but
have two, as in a real score. You can stack simultaneous bars under each
other. You can
