Well, to answer my own query, what I have below gives what I want - back
of the title page is blank, and I get a blank page between the two
scores without the title page being repeated. I had to turn off page
numbering initially to prevent a page number of 0 showing up on the back
of the title
On 27/02/2008, Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
> Sometimes the LP still seems a bit pessimistic about fitting the
> systems on a desired number of pages. Setting between-system-padding
> to zero and adjusting the between-system-space instead usually works.
Speak of the Devil... :-)
Today I wrote a pie
Hi, Joe
On 25/02/2008, Joe Neeman wrote:
> Sorry, I missed this email. Is this still an issue? If so, could you
> send the example that fails in an email? I tried 2 examples given by
> Paul in this thread and they both took up 2 pages with latest git. But
> maybe I didn't find the right exampl
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 01:59 -0800, Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
> > Has this issue taken some steps backwards? I compiled both of Paul's
> > examples in this thread using versions 2.11.32 and 2.11.37. The first
> > one with headers takes two pages on both vers
If you want to discuss issues with the latest development releases, I'd
recommend to use the lilypond-devel mailing list. I have forwarded
this email there.
/Mats
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Dear All,
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Has this issue taken some steps backwards? I compiled both of Paul's
Dear All,
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
> Has this issue taken some steps backwards? I compiled both of Paul's
> examples in this thread using versions 2.11.32 and 2.11.37. The first
> one with headers takes two pages on both versions. The second one
> without a header takes two pages on 2.11.32 and
Dear All,
Paul Scott wrote:
> Paul Scott wrote:
>> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>> 2007/11/21, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've just release 2.11.35.
> It solves both problems in this thread!
>
> Thanks!
Has this issue taken some steps backwards? I compiled both of Paul's
examples in thi
Francisco Vila wrote:
2007/11/21, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/21, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've just release 2.11.35.
I'll be happy to test it when it's available.
it's already on lilypond.org, however, someth
Paul Scott wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/21, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've just release 2.11.35.
It solves both problems in this thread!
Thanks!
Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mail
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/21, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've just release 2.11.35.
I'll be happy to test it when it's available.
it's already on lilypond.org, however, something must have broken with
our mirroring process to linuxaudio.org
Found it.
Thanks!
2007/11/21, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I've just release 2.11.35.
> >
> I'll be happy to test it when it's available.
it's already on lilypond.org, however, something must have broken with
our mirroring process to linuxaudio.org
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4a
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:07:42 Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> 2007/11/17, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > PPPS: In the next version, you will be able to set page-count =
> > #some-number in the paper block, which should make these things easier to
> > control.
>
> I've just release 2.11.35.
> I've not
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> 2007/11/17, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> PPPS: In the next version, you will be able to set page-count = #some-number
>> in the paper block, which should make these things easier to control.
>>
>
> I've just release 2.11.35.
>
I'll be happy to test it
2007/11/17, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> PPPS: In the next version, you will be able to set page-count = #some-number
> in the paper block, which should make these things easier to control.
I've just release 2.11.35.
I've noticed that most examples, take some more vertical space
(mozart: 5 i
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Due to time constraints I wasn't able to read the new documentation at
all (you are a hero, BTW, for investing so much time into this!), thus
I can't suggest a possible location for inclusion. Maybe it's not
necessary at all since lilypond's layout process is already docume
> >> Warning: long-winded explanation follows. [...]
> >
> > This is an excellent description which should probably go into the
> > documentation.
>
> Really? I skimmed through it, and it looked like a discussion about a
> current bug.
I meant the description of lilypond's behaviour w.r.t. fo
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Warning: long-winded explanation follows. [...]
This is an excellent description which should probably go into the
documentation.
Really? I skimmed through it, and it looked like a discussion about a
current bug. Were you thinking of sticking it in a @refbugs secti
> Warning: long-winded explanation follows. [...]
This is an excellent description which should probably go into the
documentation.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:27:16 Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Paul's example looks very familiar. :-)
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 Joe Neeman-2 wrote:
> > If you can create a bad example without any titles, that example will
> > probably
> > still cause problems. If you can send such an example t
Hi again,
Paul's example looks very familiar. :-)
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 Joe Neeman-2 wrote:
> If you can create a bad example without any titles, that example will
> probably
> still cause problems. If you can send such an example to the mailing list,
> that would be helpful.
Last night I spent
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:00:02 Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Dear Han-Wen and all,
2007/11/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
Yes. There is finally light at the end of the GUB tunnel, so
hopefully this or next week.
Thanks for the info. I was just about to write a bitteri
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:00:02 Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
> Dear Han-Wen and all,
>
> 2007/11/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
> > Yes. There is finally light at the end of the GUB tunnel, so
> > hopefully this or next week.
>
> Thanks for the info. I was just about to write a bitterish email about the
>
Dear Han-Wen and all,
2007/11/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
> Yes. There is finally light at the end of the GUB tunnel, so
> hopefully this or next week.
Thanks for the info. I was just about to write a bitterish email about the
frustration caused by the page layout mechanism. :-)
It seems t
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/11, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks very much. Sorry I missed the bug report.
Will there be a 2.11.35?
Yes. There is finally light at the end of the GUB tunnel, so
hopefully this or next week.
Great! Thanks,
Paul
_
2007/11/11, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks very much. Sorry I missed the bug report.
>
> Will there be a 2.11.35?
Yes. There is finally light at the end of the GUB tunnel, so
hopefully this or next week.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:58:45 Paul Scott wrote:
2.11.34
In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first
page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to
move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly
doesn't ta
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:58:45 Paul Scott wrote:
> 2.11.34
>
> In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first
> page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to
> move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly
> doesn't take as much ve
Jeff Elliott wrote:
I also have (just last night) had a similar vertical spacing problem
(2.11.34).
I had a piece covering two pages, the majority on the first page, and
the page break was where
I wanted it. Then I change a bit of the spacing of a text markup
(extra-offset) and I lost one of t
I also have (just last night) had a similar vertical spacing problem
(2.11.34).
I had a piece covering two pages, the majority on the first page, and
the page break was where
I wanted it. Then I change a bit of the spacing of a text markup
(extra-offset) and I lost one of the
systems on the
Michael David Crawford wrote:
> Paul Scott wrote:
> > 2.11.34
> >
> > In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first
> > page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to
> > move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly
> > doesn't
Paul Scott wrote:
> 2.11.34
>
> In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first
> page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to
> move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly
> doesn't take as much vertical space as one system.
Actually never mind - I figured out how to make the breaks discussed
in issue 343 and in my previous posts work on the current development
branch!
I'll post a simple example, once I've pared the irrelevant code out of
my layout page, for those who are also interested in proportional
notation of mu
Hi Mats,
Thanks for filing the bug on my pagebreaking issue.
Is there a way to get the 2.10.25 release in which you mentioned the
breaking works as expected? I couldn't find it on lilypond.org. I'm
using mac, powerpc.
Also, do you know anything about the upper limit (508 cm) I seem to
have enc
See the section on Line breaking for information on how to include
line breaks in the middle of a measure. The same principle applies to
page breaks.
/Mats
Adam James Wilson wrote:
Hi,
I'm a first time poster - I've been trying to use Lilypond for
proportionally notating multi-tempo music.
I should really learn to press "Reply to List". Here's try number 2:
> Hello,
> I'm enjoying version 2.4 on Mac OS X. I am making some variations of an
> exercise and would like to spread it out over two pages. I am not quite
> happy with how it comes out and would like to insert a page break.
Walter Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm enjoying version 2.4 on Mac OS X. I am making some variations of an
> exercise and would like to spread it out over two pages. I am not quite
> happy with how it comes out and would like to insert a page break. Nothing I
> seem to do
This is because the \newpage command just redefines what will happen
between successive score lines within a piece. To get a page break
between two pieces, you can simply insert a LaTeX page breaking
command in the titling text:
\header{ piece = "\\newpage Piece 2" }
/Mats
Pascal Legris wrote:
This example give me also a page break, but "\newpage" does not work
between two pieces like:
\score{
\notes\relative c'{
c d e f g a b c \newpage
}
\header { piece = "Piece 1" }
\paper {}
}
\score{
\notes\relative c'{
c d e f g a b c
}
\header { piece = "Piece 2" }
\paper
The following example gives two pages here.
\score{
\notes\relative c'{
c d e f \newpage g a b c
}}
/Mats
Pascal Legris wrote:
Hi,
For me, \newpage in at bar lines do nothing, but \\newpage in piece
header is fine.
For instance :
\header { piece = "\\huge \\begin{center} \\newpage \\textbf{
cc :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: page
Hi,
For me, \newpage in at bar lines do nothing, but \\newpage in piece
header is fine.
For instance :
\header { piece = "\\huge \\begin{center} \\newpage \\textbf{Noel
Anglois} \\\* \\end{center} \\Large \\textit{Cornet de recit}" }
Lilypond: version 2.2.2
@+,
Pascal
Le 14 juin 04, à 17:24, Ma
You can add a page break using the command \newpage. Just as
\break for line breaking, it will only work at bar lines.
For the moment, there's no way to prevent page breaks, but often
you can control it by adding them manually where you want them.
/Mats
LEGRAND Jean-Marc wrote:
HI !
I've been tr
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand the ly2dvi/lilypond/latex (not sure which chooses it)
> page break selection. Sometimes it puts consecutive \score blocks on a
> new page, sometimes it doesn't. How can I influence these decisions if
> I think I can do a better job?
Basically, the page breaking is ha
43 matches
Mail list logo
