Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi Dave,
Hi Jan ! Sorry for this delayed reply, I've been a bit overwhelmed here.
Too much work, too much family stuff going on, too much of everything
except spare time.
If your objection to LWN is re: someone else's comment on my articles
Yeah, that'
Here's the Saraband from essay in Finale 2008, which is only one
version of Finale behind the current one. I put it together while
contemplating Graham's grand web project.
Andrew
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> As for LilyPond vs. Sibelius: if we do it, we should do it
> objectively. One thing we might do in the new website is to have
> examples of notation from the latest software (lilypond stable,
> finale 20XY, sibelius 20AB, etc) and point o
Op vrijdag 03-04-2009 om 23:27 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> I really don't see anything in the comments that we need to be
> worried about.
You're probably right. I have a hard time getting used to uninformed
posts on lwn.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The mus
I really don't see anything in the comments that we need to be
worried about. I mean, do you think that Microsoft programmers
freak out when they read (-1, troll) comments on slashdot? If
there were intelligent, well-argued comments on LWN dissing
lilypond, I might care, but I haven't seen any ye
Op vrijdag 03-04-2009 om 15:50 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Valentin
Villenave:
Hi Valentin,
> On a personal note:
LOL, hilarious. Thanks Valentin. We should have added this with much
pump and circumstance to our new website/what users think page two days
ago :-)
Maybe next year?
Greeting
> "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson writes:
Mats> I think we can agree that both LilyPond and Sibelius are
Mats> among the better options when it comes to typesetting
Mats> quality, right?
Sibelius is certainly not one of the better options for establishing
communication with free softwar
Valentin Villenave wrote:
> What's the phrase already? First they ignore you...
You have forgotten the positive ending of that phrase ... :-)
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you,
then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
___
li
There's been quite some bashing on Sibelius from the LilyPond side as
well, so we should probably not complain too much. I think we can agree
that both LilyPond and Sibelius are among the better options when it
comes to typesetting quality, right?
/Mats
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2009/4/3
2009/4/3 Dave Phillips :
> If your objection to LWN is re: someone else's comment on my articles, then
> that's fine with me. But if anyone has a problem with my articles per se I'd
> prefer they take it up with me, not with my publishers.
Not at all. It's just some comments that (by design, I thi
Op vrijdag 03-04-2009 om 07:44 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Dave
Phillips:
Hi Dave,
> If your objection to LWN is re: someone else's comment on my articles
Yeah, that's it. Somehow, whenever you write a fine piece on or even
mentioning Lily, there are uninformed comments that "need" to be
rep
11 matches
Mail list logo
