At 12:22 04/10/2014 -0700, Vincenzo Auer wrote:
I've searched on "beyond bars" 2011 ed. ...
That's *Behind* Bars, in fact: it's a pun on the expression meaning
"in prison".
... but I wasn't able to find a reference to this problem.
Any excuse to consult the bible! Page 484, under "Bar num
Am 04.10.2014 um 21:22 schrieb Son_V:
If a piece starts with an incomplete measure this measure doesn't have a
number
Well, thanks. I've searched on "beyond bars" 2011 ed. but I wasn't able to
find a reference to this problem. Nor I was able to found a way in the
index: no "irregular beats". Ma
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 20:54 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 04.10.2014 20:40, schrieb Son_V:
> > Sorry, I can't understand; with MuseScore I see the bar numbers as
> > "correct",
> > as far I can understand. The first beat, that have just one note, is not
> > numbered, but the following one is labell
- Original Message -
From: "Son_V"
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: losing a bar number when the first beat is irregular
If a piece starts with an incomplete measure this measure doesn't have a
number
Well, thanks. I've searched on &
> If a piece starts with an incomplete measure this measure doesn't have a
number
Well, thanks. I've searched on "beyond bars" 2011 ed. but I wasn't able to
find a reference to this problem. Nor I was able to found a way in the
index: no "irregular beats". Maybe it's hidden in another chapter.
But
Am 04.10.2014 20:40, schrieb Son_V:
Sorry, I can't understand; with MuseScore I see the bar numbers as "correct",
as far I can understand. The first beat, that have just one note, is not
numbered, but the following one is labelled by the number "2". I thought
that this was correct. In Lilypond,
Sorry, I can't understand; with MuseScore I see the bar numbers as "correct",
as far I can understand. The first beat, that have just one note, is not
numbered, but the following one is labelled by the number "2". I thought
that this was correct. In Lilypond, the bar numbers are all a -1 in respect
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 08:55 -0700, Son_V wrote:
> you can put
> \set Score.currentBarNumber = #2
> in the first full bar to cause this to be numbered as bar 2.
>
>
> MANY THANKS. That solved.
I'm still baffled by your question - I notice that Musescore does not
generate this "incorrect" or "unc
you can put
\set Score.currentBarNumber = #2
in the first full bar to cause this to be numbered as bar 2.
MANY THANKS. That solved.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-bar-number-when-the-first-beat-is-irregular-tp167125p167146.html
Sent from the U
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 06:57 -0700, Son_V wrote:
> Yes ... bar numbering. I used it in the subject of the post, but misspelled
> it here.
In that case you can put
\set Score.currentBarNumber = #2
in the first full bar to cause this to be numbered as bar 2.
This is not the conventional numbering -
But I've made no copy or paste. And this is just the first time I post the
question; I've had that problem any time I had an anacrusis. May I post my
file? I can't see how to solve this little but annoying problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-
2014-10-04 17:25 GMT+02:00 Son_V :
> 2.18.2, the stable one.
>
So maybe a copy/paste error. Code works perfectly from my side. ;)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2.18.2, the stable one.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-bar-number-when-the-first-beat-is-irregular-tp167125p167141.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing
2014-10-04 15:59 GMT+02:00 Son_V :
> Sorry, I wasn't unable to make your examples to work. :-(
>
Which version are you using ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Sorry, I wasn't unable to make your examples to work. :-(
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-bar-number-when-the-first-beat-is-irregular-tp167125p167134.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes ... bar numbering. I used it in the subject of the post, but misspelled
it here.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-bar-number-when-the-first-beat-is-irregular-tp167125p167133.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
As Richard noticed, I suppose you're talking about "bar numbering".
Try :
\version "2.18"
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
\set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 1/4)
% mes.0
c4
\unset Timing.measureLength
% mes. 1-5
\repeat unfold 5 c1
\break
% mes. 6-10
% measure number shows
When you say "beat numbering" do you mean "bar numbering"?
Richard
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 06:20 -0700, Son_V wrote:
> Thanks Simon (for your patience, in the first place). Well, it's an
> anacrusis, I forgot to say it. And MS can handle a correct numbering. What
> I'm not able to do is to make Lil
Thanks Simon (for your patience, in the first place). Well, it's an
anacrusis, I forgot to say it. And MS can handle a correct numbering. What
I'm not able to do is to make LilyPond to understand that the fist beat, the
anacrusis, should be numbered as "beat 1". If I use \clef "treble" \key es
\ma
Am 04.10.2014 um 14:33 schrieb Son_V:
Hi all, as I have said i use Musescore to write down the notes and lyrics,
then I export to .xml to import the file in Frescobaldi. I encounter a
humble problem. If the score I'm transcribing has just one note in the first
beat, to have a correct visual corre
20 matches
Mail list logo
