Dear Neil,
thanks! Now I understand.
2009/4/3 Neil Puttock :
> 2009/4/3 Stefan Thomas :
>> Dear Neil,
>> I tried it with
>> \relative { c1 ~ c
>> \override Tie #'(details ratio 1.2) \override Tie #'(details heigth-limit
>> 13)
>> c ~ c }
>> but without sucess!
>
> Overrides need an equals sign,
2009/4/3 Stefan Thomas :
> Dear Neil,
> I tried it with
> \relative { c1 ~ c
> \override Tie #'(details ratio 1.2) \override Tie #'(details heigth-limit 13)
> c ~ c }
> but without sucess!
Overrides need an equals sign, even if the properties are nested.
\override Tie #'(details ratio) = #1.2
Dear Neil,
I tried it with
\relative { c1 ~ c
\override Tie #'(details ratio 1.2) \override Tie #'(details heigth-limit 13)
c ~ c }
but without sucess!
2009/4/2 Neil Puttock :
> 2009/3/31 Stefan Thomas :
>> Thanks! Great!
>> But I would like to ask one more question.
>> If the distance between
2009/3/31 Stefan Thomas :
> Thanks! Great!
> But I would like to ask one more question.
> If the distance between two notes is larger, I think the amount of the
> curve should be a little larger too. Can this be changed, generally if
> possible, too?
I haven't tested this myself, but you could try
Thanks! Great!
But I would like to ask one more question.
If the distance between two notes is larger, I think the amount of the
curve should be a little larger too. Can this be changed, generally if
possible, too?
2009/3/30 Neil Puttock :
> 2009/3/30 Stefan Thomas :
>> Dear community,
>> in the b
2009/3/30 Stefan Thomas :
> Dear community,
> in the below quoted snippet the position of the tie isn't convincing,
> in my opinion. It should be al little further apart from the
> notes. Off couse I could type \override Tie #'staff-position all the
> time, but I would be interested in tweaking it
