On Wednesday 11 May 2005 03:54 am, Bernard Hurley wrote:
> I have seen this notation too in transcriptions of vihuela music. I
> guess it wouldn't be too difficult to implement. Maybe you would need
a
> different notation for a "mobile dot" (e.g. d4*).
This would make a lot of sense: d2 d4\dot,
> "HN" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
HN> Laura Conrad wrote:
>> Do we have a way to put the barline between the notehead and the dot?
HN> No. You have to fake it with transparent notes, I guess.
Well, for the moment, I just left out the barline, but I think it's
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 09:39 am, Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> Do we have a way to put the barline between the notehead and the dot?
> It's fairly common in modern mensurstriche editions, and the later
> Dowland facsimiles that I'm transcribing these days do it as well.
It's interesting, to me anyway,
I have seen this notation too in transcriptions of vihuela music. I
guess it wouldn't be too difficult to implement. Maybe you would need a
different notation for a "mobile dot" (e.g. d4*).
/Bernard
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> You could always play with
> \once \override Dots #'extra-offse
You could always play with
\once \override Dots #'extra-offset = #'(2 . 0)
but the results will be fairly unreliable when the spacing changes.
/Mats
Laura Conrad wrote:
Do we have a way to put the barline between the notehead and the dot?
It's fairly common in modern mensurstriche editions, and
