Re: chordnames tweaking again

Am 2009-10-22 um 15:45 schrieb Carl Sorensen: Of course I found this in the docs, but it looks like the exceptions mechanism is only meant for your own additions, not for overriding defaults?

Re: chordnames tweaking again

Am 2009-10-22 um 18:34 schrieb Carl Sorensen: Another approach: Is there a possibility to "just print" any modification, regardless if it has any meaning, like f:m{stuff} No, I don't think so. But you might be able to use f:m\markup{stuff} to get what you want. No, I checked that - you

Re: chordnames tweaking again

On 10/22/09 7:50 AM, "Henning Hraban Ramm" wrote: > 2009/10/22 Carl Sorensen : >>> Of course I found this in the docs, but it looks like the exceptions >>> mechanism is only m

Re: chordnames tweaking again

2009/10/22 Carl Sorensen : >>> >> #Customizing-chord-names> >> Of course I found this in the docs, but it looks like the exceptions >> mechanism is only meant for your own additions, not for overriding >> defaults? > chor

Re: chordnames tweaking again

On 10/22/09 7:30 AM, "Henning Hraban Ramm" wrote: > 2009/10/21 Carl Sorensen : > >>> (2) Different, probably easier problem: >>> I must display some alterations as follows: >>> f:dim => f- >>> f:aug => f5+ >>> f:maj7 => f7+ >>> >> Probably the easiest way to do these is to use a custom chord

Re: chordnames tweaking again

2009/10/21 Carl Sorensen : >> I don't understand enough Scheme to avoid "ees" - do you? > I assume you want to get Es for E flat major and es for e flat minor. > (I'm not sure about this -- I'm totally american in my chord experience). Yes, exactly. >>         (cond >             ((and (= altera

Re: chordnames tweaking again

On 10/20/09 1:27 PM, "fiëé visuëlle" wrote: > Hello again, still fiddling with chord names... > > (1) > I use this nice Scheme function by Carl Sorensen to get "fis" and > "des" names instead of "f#" and "db". > I don't understand enough Scheme to avoid "ees" - do you? I assume you want to g