Neil Puttock Tuesday, December 30, 2008 3:45 PM
2008/12/29 Trevor Daniels :
Neil Puttock wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 1:25 PM
2008/12/29 Trevor Daniels :
OK - have this in hand. Thanks.
Trevor, I'm working on some additions to 'bound-details in
changing-defaults.itely at the mome
2008/12/29 Trevor Daniels :
>
> Neil Puttock wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 1:25 PM
>
>
>> 2008/12/29 Trevor Daniels :
>>>
>>> OK - have this in hand. Thanks.
>>
>> Trevor, I'm working on some additions to 'bound-details in
>> changing-defaults.itely at the moment. When I've finished, I'll add
Neil Puttock wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 1:25 PM
2008/12/29 Trevor Daniels :
OK - have this in hand. Thanks.
Trevor, I'm working on some additions to 'bound-details in
changing-defaults.itely at the moment. When I've finished, I'll add
some info to the section which discusses 'outsi
2008/12/29 Trevor Daniels :
>
> OK - have this in hand. Thanks.
Trevor, I'm working on some additions to 'bound-details in
changing-defaults.itely at the moment. When I've finished, I'll add
some info to the section which discusses 'outside-staff-priority.
As for the general issue with accident
James E. Bailey wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 8:23 AM
Am 29.12.2008 um 06:26 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
However, there are situations where you don't have access to the
mailing list, and then you have to find it in the docs. Can you
suggest where improvements shall be added so that your speci
Am 29.12.2008 um 06:26 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
However, there are situations where you don't have access to the
mailing list, and then you have to find it in the docs. Can you
suggest where improvements shall be added so that your specific
problem is covered?
Well then I'd have to say that t
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 06:26:41AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Sounds sensible. Can you cook up a small example which
> demonstrates the effect you've sought? We can easily add it to
> the documentation then.
Ideally add it directly to LSR; this greatly simplifies the
process of getting it in
> > However, there are situations where you don't have access to the
> > mailing list, and then you have to find it in the docs. Can you
> > suggest where improvements shall be added so that your specific
> > problem is covered?
>
> Well then I'd have to say that the easiest, and easiest to find
Am 29.12.2008 um 00:17 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
Once I learned about outside staff-priority, everything was good.
Which for me is the usual situation: I get unexpected output, and
then learn that there's a perfectly acceptable reason for that
output. In this case: outside-staff-priority takes p
> Once I learned about outside staff-priority, everything was good.
> Which for me is the usual situation: I get unexpected output, and
> then learn that there's a perfectly acceptable reason for that
> output. In this case: outside-staff-priority takes precedence over
> avoid-slur. The learning
Am 28.12.2008 um 06:48 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
Oh, perhaps I haven't made this clear. I have read the learning
manual. I do not have it memorised. I don't use extra offset all
that often. I asked for help because the ways I know of how to move
the object, (namely looking in the IR for thin
> Oh, perhaps I haven't made this clear. I have read the learning
> manual. I do not have it memorised. I don't use extra offset all
> that often. I asked for help because the ways I know of how to move
> the object, (namely looking in the IR for things that might control
> positioning the obje
Am 27.12.2008 um 19:37 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:37:35AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
Am 27.12.2008 um 01:07 schrieb Graham Percival:
Of course I omitted that. You're assumed to have read the
Learning Manual. In particular, LM 4.5.1 and 4.5.2.
So wait, the mos
2008/12/27 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:37:35AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.12.2008 um 01:07 schrieb Graham Percival:
>>
>>> Of course I omitted that. You're assumed to have read the
>>> Learning Manual. In particular, LM 4.5.1 and 4.5.2.
>>
>> So wait, the most us
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:37:35AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
>
> Am 27.12.2008 um 01:07 schrieb Graham Percival:
>
>> Of course I omitted that. You're assumed to have read the
>> Learning Manual. In particular, LM 4.5.1 and 4.5.2.
>
> So wait, the most useful piece of information, the piece o
Am 27.12.2008 um 01:07 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 01:01:19AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
he still omitted the easiest part of helping which could have
simple been, \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'( 0.0 . -5.0),
instead of the wonderful instruction in how to pr
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 01:01:19AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
>
> he still omitted the easiest part of helping which could have
> simple been, \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'( 0.0 . -5.0),
> instead of the wonderful instruction in how to properly use lilypond.
Of course I omitted th
Am 26.12.2008 um 23:59 schrieb Graham Percival:
Well, first start off with a simple example:
\version "2.11.65"
\relative c'' {
c4(
\once \set suggestAccidentals = ##t
cis d4.) c8
}
Hmm, it prints an error message. It would be helpful to report
this to the bug list.
You know, I nev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 26. Dezember 2008 23:40:12 schrieb James E. Bailey:
> Am 26.12.2008 um 17:57 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > To everybody apart from Eyolf who posted in this thread: musica
> > ficta can be found through a "see also" link under NR 1.1
> > Acci
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:40:12PM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
>
> Am 26.12.2008 um 17:57 schrieb Graham Percival:
>>>
>> To everybody apart from Eyolf who posted in this thread: musica
>> ficta can be found through a "see also" link under NR 1.1
>> Accidentals,
>
> Perhaps you have a different v
Am 26.12.2008 um 17:57 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:50:46PM +0100, Eyolf ?strem wrote:
On 26.12.2008 (15:06), Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
If so then I'd just use d!4. instead.
No, it was common practice to put accidentals above notes in
older times.
Sometimes these we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 26. Dezember 2008 21:46:07 schrieb James E. Bailey:
> Neil, thanks for the help, now I guess I move on to the next part of
> this problem:
> \version "2.11.65"
>
> \relative c'' {
> \override TextScript #'avoid-slur = #'inside
> \ov
In the meantime, I figured out another solution: I can just do
everything in markup, and set the baseline skip myself.
\version "2.11.65"
\relative c'' {
\override TextScript #'avoid-slur = #'inside
\override TextScript #'outside-staff-priority = ##f
c2*1/2( s4^\markup \tiny \override
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 09:46:07PM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
> Neil, thanks for the help, now I guess I move on to the next part of
> this problem:
What's the problem?
By that question, I mean "what's the musical intent of that
lilypond code?". Because to me, it looks like you're trying to
Neil, thanks for the help, now I guess I move on to the next part of
this problem:
\version "2.11.65"
\relative c'' {
\override TextScript #'avoid-slur = #'inside
\override Script #'avoid-slur = #'inside
\override TextScript #'script-priority = #-100
\override TextScript #'outside-s
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:50:46PM +0100, Eyolf ?strem wrote:
> On 26.12.2008 (15:06), Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > > If so then I'd just use d!4. instead.
> >
> > No, it was common practice to put accidentals above notes in older times.
> > Sometimes these were meant to be optional, sometimes t
2008/12/26 james :
> I'm having some difficulty understanding the 'avoid-slur property. This
> doesn't work:
> \version "2.11.65"
>
> \relative c'' {
> \override TextScript #'avoid-slur = #'inside
> c2*1/2( s4^\markup {\natural} d4.) c8
> }
What's the musical sense of this?
Maybe what you want
Hi James,
2008/12/26 James E. Bailey :
> No, I want the natural under the slur. Which I what I thought inside did.
You'll have to turn off 'outside-staff-priority for TextScript, since
it takes precendence over 'avoid-slur.
\override TextScript #'outside-staff-priority = ##f
Regards,
Neil
__
On 26.12.2008 (15:06), Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > If so then I'd just use d!4. instead.
>
> No, it was common practice to put accidentals above notes in older times.
> Sometimes these were meant to be optional, sometimes they were cautinary
> accidentals. In any case, if you try to be close t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 26. Dezember 2008 14:33:11 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
> James E. Bailey wrote:
> > Am 26.12.2008 um 13:15 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
> >> james wrote:
> >>> I'm having some difficulty understanding the 'avoid-slur property.
> >>> This doesn't work:
James E. Bailey wrote:
Am 26.12.2008 um 13:15 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
james wrote:
I'm having some difficulty understanding the 'avoid-slur property.
This doesn't work:
\version "2.11.65"
\relative c'' {
\override TextScript #'avoid-slur = #'inside
c2*1/2( s4^\markup {\natural} d4.) c8
Am 26.12.2008 um 13:15 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
james wrote:
I'm having some difficulty understanding the 'avoid-slur property.
This doesn't work:
\version "2.11.65"
\relative c'' {
\override TextScript #'avoid-slur = #'inside
c2*1/2( s4^\markup {\natural} d4.) c8
}
In fact, it increases
james wrote:
I'm having some difficulty understanding the 'avoid-slur property. This
doesn't work:
\version "2.11.65"
\relative c'' {
\override TextScript #'avoid-slur = #'inside
c2*1/2( s4^\markup {\natural} d4.) c8
}
In fact, it increases the space between the slur and the notes, but
33 matches
Mail list logo
