Re: avoid merging stems

2015-06-15 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 15.06.2015 um 01:43 schrieb musicus: Ok, this sounds indeed very interesting. I understand your explenation regarding nesting of <<>> in following way: << {"layerOne"} \\ << {"layerOne"} \\ {"layerTwo"} >> >> which leads to the problem: \version "2.19.17" << {a' a' a

Re: avoid merging stems

2015-06-14 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 14.06.2015 um 23:00 schrieb musicus: so \voiceXxx should work, or not? Why doesn't the stem of "\voiceOne g" go up as intended? I didn’t figure the exact reason, but generally it’s because of the nested << \\ >>. The following works perfectly fine: \version "2.19.17" { << \clef bass

Re: avoid merging stems

2015-06-14 Thread David Kastrup
musicus writes: > so \voiceXxx should work, or not? > Why doesn't the stem of "\voiceOne g" go up as intended? Sure, it's a > quite rare usecase, but i hope you can see my point. > I don't want to merge the \voiceOne and \voiceTwo stems and if you try > to hide/ omit one of both stems, both disap

Re: avoid merging stems

2015-06-14 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-06-14 20:20 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : > Am 14.06.2015 um 15:32 schrieb musicus: >> >> This helps indeed a lot. >> On the other hand I'd be interested how to avoid stem merging... NoteHeads >> are controllable with "\mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn" etc. >> Is there any similar function to do the sam

Re: avoid merging stems

2015-06-14 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 14.06.2015 um 15:32 schrieb musicus: This helps indeed a lot. On the other hand I'd be interested how to avoid stem merging... NoteHeads are controllable with "\mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn" etc. Is there any similar function to do the same with stems? There’s no such thing like stem merging. Ei

Re: avoid merging stems

2015-06-14 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 14.06.2015 um 15:04 schrieb musicus: Yes, I want to leave the first g4 with no stem. (a specialty with string instruments: If you have to play the same pitch with two different strings simultaneously, there are two identical noteheads with one stem between) No need for acrobatics here: {

Re: avoid merging stems

2015-06-14 Thread Trevor Daniels
musicus wrote Sunday, June 14, 2015 12:16 PM > I'd like to avoid "stem-merging" in measure 13 between the upper g2. and the > first lower g4. > Additionally I'd like to hide the stem of the first lower g4 in m.13 (should > be no problem, if the stems don't merge). > I tried a couple of things

Re: avoid merging stems

2015-06-14 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-06-14 13:16 GMT+02:00 musicus : > Hello, > > I'd like to avoid "stem-merging" in measure 13 between the upper g2. and the > first lower g4. > Additionally I'd like to hide the stem of the first lower g4 in m.13 (should > be no problem, if the stems don't merge). > I tried a couple of things to