Tobin Chodos writes:
> Is there no way to set beams to go over rests globally?
Not with reasonable amount of effort (you'd need to write a replacement
for the Auto_beam_engraver: the built-in one doesn't beam over rests).
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypo
Stefan Thomas wrote:
> it would be great if one could switch on the beams over
> rests automatically.
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> This would require a rewrite of the AutoBeaming code
> ...Maybe I can take a stab at it over the Christmas holiday.
Carl,
That would be awesome.
- Mark
_
On 12/7/08 10:41 AM, "Stefan Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dear Mark,
> thanks for Your answer. I knew that it is possible, to get the beamnings with
> putting the beams and the music into the same context. But I wanted to ask, if
> there is maybee a possibilitie to do this fully automat
Dear Mark,
thanks for Your answer. I knew that it is possible, to get the beamnings
with putting the beams and the music into the same context. But I wanted to
ask, if there is maybee a possibilitie to do this fully automatically. I
know that there is a possibilitie to do this in Finale and Sibeliu
Stefan,
see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-11/msg00213.html
- Mark
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Stefan Thomas-3 wrote:
>
> Dear lilypond-users,
> I have a question: is it possible, to get the beams in the below quoted
> example automatically?
> \relative { r8 [ c 8] r8 [ r16 d] r16 [ e8. ] r8 [ d] }
>
i think the easiest way is to only write a beaming instruction where to
start and where
